ghsa-5r33-mgjf-6656
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-08-16 15:30
Modified
2023-08-16 21:10
Severity ?
Summary
Jenkins Tuleap Authentication Plugin non-constant time token comparison
Details
Jenkins Tuleap Authentication Plugin 1.1.20 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison when checking whether two authentication tokens are equal.
This could potentially allow attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid authentication token.
Tuleap Authentication Plugin 1.1.21 uses a constant-time comparison when validating authentication tokens.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "io.jenkins.plugins:tuleap-oauth" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.1.21" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-40343" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-203" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-16T21:10:56Z", "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-16T15:15:11Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Jenkins Tuleap Authentication Plugin 1.1.20 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison when checking whether two authentication tokens are equal.\n\nThis could potentially allow attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid authentication token.\n\nTuleap Authentication Plugin 1.1.21 uses a constant-time comparison when validating authentication tokens.", "id": "GHSA-5r33-mgjf-6656", "modified": "2023-08-16T21:10:56Z", "published": "2023-08-16T15:30:18Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40343" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-08-16/#SECURITY-3229" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/08/16/3" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Jenkins Tuleap Authentication Plugin non-constant time token comparison" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.