ghsa-5p9f-55j8-922m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-08-13 20:49
Modified
2020-06-17 15:14
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Moderate severity vulnerability that affects doorkeeper
Details
Withdrawn, accidental duplicate publish.
The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "doorkeeper"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-17T15:14:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Withdrawn, accidental duplicate publish.\n\nThe Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification.",
"id": "GHSA-5p9f-55j8-922m",
"modified": "2020-06-17T15:14:35Z",
"published": "2018-08-13T20:49:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6582"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5p9f-55j8-922m"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Moderate severity vulnerability that affects doorkeeper",
"withdrawn": "2020-06-17T15:14:35Z"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…