ghsa-5jhg-r53r-xqcr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:54
Modified
2022-05-14 03:54
Severity ?
Details
tif_write.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an issue in the error code path of TIFFFlushData1() that didn't reset the tif_rawcc and tif_rawcp members. Reported as MSVR 35095, aka "TIFFFlushData1 heap-buffer-overflow."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-9534" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-11-22T19:59:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "tif_write.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an issue in the error code path of TIFFFlushData1() that didn\u0027t reset the tif_rawcc and tif_rawcp members. Reported as MSVR 35095, aka \"TIFFFlushData1 heap-buffer-overflow.\"", "id": "GHSA-5jhg-r53r-xqcr", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9534" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/83a4b92815ea04969d494416eaae3d4c6b338e4a#diff-5be5ce02d0dea67050d5b2a10102d1ba" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0225.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3762" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94484" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94743" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.