ghsa-5jhg-r53r-xqcr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:54
Modified
2022-05-14 03:54
Severity ?
Details

tif_write.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an issue in the error code path of TIFFFlushData1() that didn't reset the tif_rawcc and tif_rawcp members. Reported as MSVR 35095, aka "TIFFFlushData1 heap-buffer-overflow."

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-9534"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-11-22T19:59:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "tif_write.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an issue in the error code path of TIFFFlushData1() that didn\u0027t reset the tif_rawcc and tif_rawcp members. Reported as MSVR 35095, aka \"TIFFFlushData1 heap-buffer-overflow.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-5jhg-r53r-xqcr",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:54:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9534"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/83a4b92815ea04969d494416eaae3d4c6b338e4a#diff-5be5ce02d0dea67050d5b2a10102d1ba"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0225.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3762"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94743"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.