ghsa-59f6-f4pc-ww92
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-09-11 18:35
Modified
2025-09-11 18:35
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rcutorture: Fix rcutorture_one_extend_check() splat in RT kernels

For built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, running rcutorture tests resulted in the following splat:

[ 68.797425] rcutorture_one_extend_check during change: Current 0x1 To add 0x1 To remove 0x0 preempt_count() 0x0 [ 68.797533] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 512 at kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c:1993 rcutorture_one_extend_check+0x419/0x560 [rcutorture] [ 68.797601] Call Trace: [ 68.797602] [ 68.797619] ? lockdep_softirqs_off+0xa5/0x160 [ 68.797631] rcutorture_one_extend+0x18e/0xcc0 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c] [ 68.797646] ? local_clock+0x19/0x40 [ 68.797659] rcu_torture_one_read+0xf0/0x280 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c] [ 68.797678] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_one_read+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c] [ 68.797804] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_timer+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c] [ 68.797815] rcu-torture: rcu_torture_reader task started [ 68.797824] rcu-torture: Creating rcu_torture_reader task [ 68.797824] rcu_torture_reader+0x238/0x580 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c] [ 68.797836] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x15/0x30

Disable BH does not change the SOFTIRQ corresponding bits in preempt_count() for RT kernels, this commit therefore use softirq_count() to check the if BH is disabled.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-39745"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-11T17:15:37Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrcutorture: Fix rcutorture_one_extend_check() splat in RT kernels\n\nFor built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, running rcutorture\ntests resulted in the following splat:\n\n[   68.797425] rcutorture_one_extend_check during change: Current 0x1  To add 0x1  To remove 0x0  preempt_count() 0x0\n[   68.797533] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 512 at kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c:1993 rcutorture_one_extend_check+0x419/0x560 [rcutorture]\n[   68.797601] Call Trace:\n[   68.797602]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[   68.797619]  ? lockdep_softirqs_off+0xa5/0x160\n[   68.797631]  rcutorture_one_extend+0x18e/0xcc0 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c]\n[   68.797646]  ? local_clock+0x19/0x40\n[   68.797659]  rcu_torture_one_read+0xf0/0x280 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c]\n[   68.797678]  ? __pfx_rcu_torture_one_read+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c]\n[   68.797804]  ? __pfx_rcu_torture_timer+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c]\n[   68.797815] rcu-torture: rcu_torture_reader task started\n[   68.797824] rcu-torture: Creating rcu_torture_reader task\n[   68.797824]  rcu_torture_reader+0x238/0x580 [rcutorture 2466dbd2ff34dbaa36049cb323a80c3306ac997c]\n[   68.797836]  ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x15/0x30\n\nDisable BH does not change the SOFTIRQ corresponding bits in\npreempt_count() for RT kernels, this commit therefore use\nsoftirq_count() to check the if BH is disabled.",
  "id": "GHSA-59f6-f4pc-ww92",
  "modified": "2025-09-11T18:35:51Z",
  "published": "2025-09-11T18:35:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39745"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69c5ae0f441c2d72e8f48dc1e08464c172360c4c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d71351d88e478d3c4e945e3218e97ec677fd807"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a85550267247cdf5e7499be00ea8e388ab014e50"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…