ghsa-58hj-575g-5j25
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:16
Modified
2023-09-18 22:35
Summary
Apache Tomcat allows webmasters to insert xss into error messages
Details
A cross-site scripting vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 3.2.1 allows a malicious webmaster to embed Javascript in a request for a .JSP file, which causes the Javascript to be inserted into an error message.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "Maven", name: "org.apache.tomcat:tomcat", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { last_affected: "3.2.1", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2001-0829", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-80", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2023-09-18T22:35:47Z", nvd_published_at: "2001-12-06T05:00:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "A cross-site scripting vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 3.2.1 allows a malicious webmaster to embed Javascript in a request for a .JSP file, which causes the Javascript to be inserted into an error message.", id: "GHSA-58hj-575g-5j25", modified: "2023-09-18T22:35:47Z", published: "2022-04-30T18:16:47Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-0829", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://web.archive.org/web/20021108153830/http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/2982", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://web.archive.org/web/20021201182720/http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.2-doc/readme", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://web.archive.org/web/20061208015126/http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2001/07/msg00021.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], summary: "Apache Tomcat allows webmasters to insert xss into error messages", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.