ghsa-5569-859r-969g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-08-19 18:31
Modified
2025-08-19 18:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/hns: Fix double destruction of rsv_qp

rsv_qp may be double destroyed in error flow, first in free_mr_init(), and then in hns_roce_exit(). Fix it by moving the free_mr_init() call into hns_roce_v2_init().

list_del corruption, ffff589732eb9b50->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100) WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1047115 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry_valid+0x148/0x240 ... Call trace: __list_del_entry_valid+0x148/0x240 hns_roce_qp_remove+0x4c/0x3f0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_v2_destroy_qp_common+0x1dc/0x5f4 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_v2_destroy_qp+0x22c/0x46c [hns_roce_hw_v2] free_mr_exit+0x6c/0x120 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_v2_exit+0x170/0x200 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_exit+0x118/0x350 [hns_roce_hw_v2] __hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x1c8/0x304 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify_init+0x170/0x21c [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify+0x6c/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hclge_notify_roce_client+0x6c/0x160 [hclge] hclge_reset_rebuild+0x150/0x5c0 [hclge] hclge_reset+0x10c/0x140 [hclge] hclge_reset_subtask+0x80/0x104 [hclge] hclge_reset_service_task+0x168/0x3ac [hclge] hclge_service_task+0x50/0x100 [hclge] process_one_work+0x250/0x9a0 worker_thread+0x324/0x990 kthread+0x190/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38582"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-19T17:15:35Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/hns: Fix double destruction of rsv_qp\n\nrsv_qp may be double destroyed in error flow, first in free_mr_init(),\nand then in hns_roce_exit(). Fix it by moving the free_mr_init() call\ninto hns_roce_v2_init().\n\nlist_del corruption, ffff589732eb9b50-\u003enext is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)\nWARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1047115 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry_valid+0x148/0x240\n...\nCall trace:\n __list_del_entry_valid+0x148/0x240\n hns_roce_qp_remove+0x4c/0x3f0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_v2_destroy_qp_common+0x1dc/0x5f4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_v2_destroy_qp+0x22c/0x46c [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n free_mr_exit+0x6c/0x120 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_v2_exit+0x170/0x200 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_exit+0x118/0x350 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n __hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x1c8/0x304 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify_init+0x170/0x21c [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify+0x6c/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hclge_notify_roce_client+0x6c/0x160 [hclge]\n hclge_reset_rebuild+0x150/0x5c0 [hclge]\n hclge_reset+0x10c/0x140 [hclge]\n hclge_reset_subtask+0x80/0x104 [hclge]\n hclge_reset_service_task+0x168/0x3ac [hclge]\n hclge_service_task+0x50/0x100 [hclge]\n process_one_work+0x250/0x9a0\n worker_thread+0x324/0x990\n kthread+0x190/0x210\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18",
  "id": "GHSA-5569-859r-969g",
  "modified": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z",
  "published": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38582"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10b083dbba22be19baa848432b6f25aa68ab2db5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6957b95ecc5b63c5a4bb4ecc28af326cf8f6dc8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dab173bae3303f074f063750a8dead2550d8c782"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fc8b0f5b16bab2e032b4cfcd6218d5df3b80b2ea"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.