ghsa-5385-7g23-qh96
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:05
Modified
2022-05-13 01:05
Details

util/ntp-keygen.c in ntp-keygen in NTP before 4.2.7p230 uses a weak RNG seed, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via a brute-force attack.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2014-9294",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2014-12-20T02:59:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "util/ntp-keygen.c in ntp-keygen in NTP before 4.2.7p230 uses a weak RNG seed, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via a brute-force attack.",
   id: "GHSA-5385-7g23-qh96",
   modified: "2022-05-13T01:05:12Z",
   published: "2022-05-13T01:05:12Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9294",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176035",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04790232",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04916783",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10103",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20141222-ntpd",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/1047-security-advisory-8",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0541.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://bk1.ntp.org/ntp-dev/util/ntp-keygen.c?PAGE=diffs&REV=4eae1b72298KRoBQmX-y8URCiRPH5g",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2666",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142469153211996&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142590659431171&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142853370924302&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=144182594518755&w=2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2025.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0104.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/62209",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Main/SecurityNotice",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/852879",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:003",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71762",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.