ghsa-4xfq-jxgg-3pg5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:42
Modified
2022-05-13 01:42
Severity ?
Details
The IEEE 802.15.4 parser in tcpdump before 4.9.2 has a buffer over-read in print-802_15_4.c:ieee802_15_4_if_print().
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-13000", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-125", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-09-14T06:29:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "The IEEE 802.15.4 parser in tcpdump before 4.9.2 has a buffer over-read in print-802_15_4.c:ieee802_15_4_if_print().", id: "GHSA-4xfq-jxgg-3pg5", modified: "2022-05-13T01:42:53Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:42:53Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-13000", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump/commit/8512734883227c11568bb35da1d48b9f8466f43f", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump/commit/9be4e0b5938b705e7e36cfcb110a740c6ff0cb97", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump/commit/a7e5f58f402e6919ec444a57946bade7dfd6b184", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:0705", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201709-23", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://support.apple.com/HT208221", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3971", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039307", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.tcpdump.org/tcpdump-changes.txt", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.