ghsa-4wp5-gx3f-rhgh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:47
Modified
2022-05-02 03:47
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple integer overflows in setnet32.exe 3.50.0.13752 in IBM Informix Client SDK 3.0 and 3.50 and Informix Connect Runtime 3.x allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .nfx file with a crafted (1) HostSize, and possibly (2) ProtoSize and (3) ServerSize, field that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow involving a crafted HostList field. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-3691" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-10-13T10:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple integer overflows in setnet32.exe 3.50.0.13752 in IBM Informix Client SDK 3.0 and 3.50 and Informix Connect Runtime 3.x allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .nfx file with a crafted (1) HostSize, and possibly (2) ProtoSize and (3) ServerSize, field that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow involving a crafted HostList field. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.", "id": "GHSA-4wp5-gx3f-rhgh", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:47:43Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:47:43Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3691" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53644" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://retrogod.altervista.org/9sg_ibm_setnet32.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36949" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1022985" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/58530" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36588" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2834" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…