ghsa-4w6w-6xrm-w35q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:59
Modified
2022-05-14 03:59
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the normify function in the rlm_pap module (modules/rlm_pap/rlm_pap.c) in FreeRADIUS 2.x, possibly 2.2.3 and earlier, and 3.x, possibly 3.0.1 and earlier, might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long password hash, as demonstrated by an SSHA hash.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-2015" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-11-02T00:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the normify function in the rlm_pap module (modules/rlm_pap/rlm_pap.c) in FreeRADIUS 2.x, possibly 2.2.3 and earlier, and 3.x, possibly 3.0.1 and earlier, might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long password hash, as demonstrated by an SSHA hash.", "id": "GHSA-4w6w-6xrm-w35q", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:59:55Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:59:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-2015" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066761" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugbusters/2014-February/000610.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugbusters/2014-February/000612.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugbusters/2014-February/000616.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1287.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2122-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/02/18/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65581" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.