ghsa-4qr3-39h9-qwp4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-01-23 03:30
Modified
2025-04-03 15:30
Severity ?
Details
processCropSelections in tools/tiffcrop.c in LibTIFF through 4.5.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow (e.g., "WRITE of size 307203") via a crafted TIFF image.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-48281", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2023-01-23T03:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "processCropSelections in tools/tiffcrop.c in LibTIFF through 4.5.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow (e.g., \"WRITE of size 307203\") via a crafted TIFF image.", id: "GHSA-4qr3-39h9-qwp4", modified: "2025-04-03T15:30:48Z", published: "2023-01-23T03:30:15Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48281", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/commit/d1b6b9c1b3cae2d9e37754506c1ad8f4f7b646b5", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/issues/488", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/01/msg00037.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-31", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230302-0004", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5333", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.