ghsa-4p8f-j9gj-x3p7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:23
Modified
2022-05-17 03:23
Details
The good_client function in rquotad (rquota_svc.c) in Linux DiskQuota (aka quota) before 3.17 invokes the hosts_ctl function the first time without a host name, which might allow remote attackers to bypass TCP Wrappers rules in hosts.deny.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-3417" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-08-13T20:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The good_client function in rquotad (rquota_svc.c) in Linux DiskQuota (aka quota) before 3.17 invokes the hosts_ctl function the first time without a host name, which might allow remote attackers to bypass TCP Wrappers rules in hosts.deny.", "id": "GHSA-4p8f-j9gj-x3p7", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:23:40Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:23:40Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3417" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566717" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/15509723" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content\u0026id=JSA10705" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://linuxquota.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linuxquota/linuxquota%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=0abbfe92536fa5854eb65572de0cf131f80e2387" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://linuxquota.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linuxquota/linuxquota;a=commitdiff;h=0abbfe92536fa5854eb65572de0cf131f80e2387" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0120.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail\u0026aid=2743481\u0026group_id=18136\u0026atid=118136" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/19/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/07/19/5" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.