ghsa-4jf8-pxjc-f722
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-10-04 18:31
Modified
2025-10-04 18:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered

While running bpf selftests it's possible to get following fault:

general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \ 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI ... Call Trace: fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270 ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10 ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10 ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10 ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80 ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0 ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40 ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0 ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250 ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120 ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc

In unregister_fprobe function we can't release fp->rethook while it's possible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.

Moving rethook_free call after fp->ops is unregistered with unregister_ftrace_function call.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-53557"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-04T16:15:51Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfprobe: Release rethook after the ftrace_ops is unregistered\n\nWhile running bpf selftests it\u0027s possible to get following fault:\n\n  general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address \\\n  0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI\n  ...\n  Call Trace:\n   \u003cTASK\u003e\n   fprobe_handler+0xc1/0x270\n   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10\n   ? __pfx_bpf_testmod_init+0x10/0x10\n   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10\n   ? bpf_fentry_test1+0x5/0x10\n   ? bpf_testmod_init+0x22/0x80\n   ? do_one_initcall+0x63/0x2e0\n   ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40\n   ? kmalloc_trace+0xaf/0xc0\n   ? do_init_module+0x60/0x250\n   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120\n   ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90\n   ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc\n   \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nIn unregister_fprobe function we can\u0027t release fp-\u003erethook while it\u0027s\npossible there are some of its users still running on another cpu.\n\nMoving rethook_free call after fp-\u003eops is unregistered with\nunregister_ftrace_function call.",
  "id": "GHSA-4jf8-pxjc-f722",
  "modified": "2025-10-04T18:31:15Z",
  "published": "2025-10-04T18:31:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53557"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03d63255a5783243c110aec5e6ae2f1475c3be76"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5f81018753dfd4989e33ece1f0cb6b8aae498b82"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce3ec57faff559ccae1e0150c1f077eb2df648a4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…