ghsa-4fjg-vv5f-pmrp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:17
Modified
2022-05-13 01:17
Details
The DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.20.0 allows remote DHCP servers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) HOST_NAME, (2) DOMAIN_NAME, (3) NIS_DOMAIN, and (4) TFTP_SERVER_NAME host name options.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2011-2716", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2012-07-03T16:40:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.20.0 allows remote DHCP servers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) HOST_NAME, (2) DOMAIN_NAME, (3) NIS_DOMAIN, and (4) TFTP_SERVER_NAME host name options.", id: "GHSA-4fjg-vv5f-pmrp", modified: "2022-05-13T01:17:59Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:17:59Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2716", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3979", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jun/14", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://support.t-mobile.com/docs/DOC-21994", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://downloads.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100158840", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153278/WAGO-852-Industrial-Managed-Switch-Series-Code-Execution-Hardcoded-Credentials.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0810.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jun/18", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Aug/20", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/45363", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.busybox.net/news.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:129", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48879", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.