ghsa-4f62-c8fw-44pp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:46
Modified
2022-05-14 03:46
Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-16844" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-11-16T15:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the loadbuf function in formisc.c in formail in procmail 3.22 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted e-mail message because of a hardcoded realloc size, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3618.", "id": "GHSA-4f62-c8fw-44pp", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:46:33Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:46:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-16844" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3269" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876511" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00019.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4041" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039844" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.