ghsa-4cm9-63x5-55wm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:06
Modified
2024-03-21 03:34
Severity ?
Details
** DISPUTED ** TensorFlow through 2.5.0 allows attackers to overwrite arbitrary files via a crafted archive when tf.keras.utils.get_file is used with extract=True. NOTE: the vendor's position is that tf.keras.utils.get_file is not intended for untrusted archives.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-35958", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-22", "CWE-668", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-06-30T01:15:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "** DISPUTED ** TensorFlow through 2.5.0 allows attackers to overwrite arbitrary files via a crafted archive when tf.keras.utils.get_file is used with extract=True. NOTE: the vendor's position is that tf.keras.utils.get_file is not intended for untrusted archives.", id: "GHSA-4cm9-63x5-55wm", modified: "2024-03-21T03:34:05Z", published: "2022-05-24T19:06:41Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-35958", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfile.html#tarfile.TarFile.extractall", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/b8cad4c631096a34461ff8a07840d5f4d123ce32/tensorflow/python/keras/README.md", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/b8cad4c631096a34461ff8a07840d5f4d123ce32/tensorflow/python/keras/utils/data_utils.py#L137", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://keras.io/api", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://vuln.ryotak.me/advisories/52", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.