ghsa-4c9x-hwrm-39j5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:57
Modified
2022-05-14 03:57
Details

Integer overflow in the jpc_pi_nextcprl function in jpc_t2cod.c in JasPer before 1.900.20 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers use of an uninitialized value.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-10251"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-03-15T14:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in the jpc_pi_nextcprl function in jpc_t2cod.c in JasPer before 1.900.20 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers use of an uninitialized value.",
  "id": "GHSA-4c9x-hwrm-39j5",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:57:55Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:57:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10251"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/1f0dfe5a42911b6880a1445f13f6d615ddb55387"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/04/jasper-use-of-uninitialized-value-in-jpc_pi_nextcprl-jpc_t2cod-c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3827"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97584"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.