ghsa-4c75-p685-qq3x
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:44
Modified
2022-05-01 18:44
Details

Integer overflow in the RTSP_remove_msg function in RTSP_lowlevel.c in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an RTP packet with a size value of 0xffff.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-6627"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-01-04T00:46:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Integer overflow in the RTSP_remove_msg function in RTSP_lowlevel.c in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an RTP packet with a size value of 0xffff.",
  "id": "GHSA-4c75-p685-qq3x",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:44:55Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:44:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-6627"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/fengulo-adv.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://aluigi.org/poc/fengulo.zip"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/40533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28229"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3507"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485574/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27049"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0011"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.