ghsa-48pg-x75p-m28c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-10-21 12:31
Modified
2025-10-21 12:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tcp: tcp_rtx_synack() can be called from process context

Laurent reported the enclosed report [1]

This bug triggers with following coditions:

0) Kernel built with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y

1) A new passive FastOpen TCP socket is created. This FO socket waits for an ACK coming from client to be a complete ESTABLISHED one. 2) A socket operation on this socket goes through lock_sock() release_sock() dance. 3) While the socket is owned by the user in step 2), a retransmit of the SYN is received and stored in socket backlog. 4) At release_sock() time, the socket backlog is processed while in process context. 5) A SYNACK packet is cooked in response of the SYN retransmit. 6) -> tcp_rtx_synack() is called in process context.

Before blamed commit, tcp_rtx_synack() was always called from BH handler, from a timer handler.

Fix this by using TCP_INC_STATS() & NET_INC_STATS() which do not assume caller is in non preemptible context.

[1] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: epollpep/2180 caller is tcp_rtx_synack.part.0+0x36/0xc0 CPU: 10 PID: 2180 Comm: epollpep Tainted: G OE 5.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 #1 Debian 5.16.12-1~bpo11+1 Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MC-H8TRF/X11SCD-F, BIOS 1.7 11/23/2021 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x5e check_preemption_disabled+0xde/0xe0 tcp_rtx_synack.part.0+0x36/0xc0 tcp_rtx_synack+0x8d/0xa0 ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x2e0/0x3e0 ? apparmor_file_alloc_security+0x3b/0x1f0 inet_rtx_syn_ack+0x16/0x30 tcp_check_req+0x367/0x610 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x91/0xf60 ? get_nohz_timer_target+0x18/0x1a0 ? lock_timer_base+0x61/0x80 ? preempt_count_add+0x68/0xa0 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xbd/0x270 __release_sock+0x6d/0xb0 release_sock+0x2b/0x90 sock_setsockopt+0x138/0x1140 ? __sys_getsockname+0x7e/0xc0 ? aa_sk_perm+0x3e/0x1a0 __sys_setsockopt+0x198/0x1e0 __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x21/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x38/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49372"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:13Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: tcp_rtx_synack() can be called from process context\n\nLaurent reported the enclosed report [1]\n\nThis bug triggers with following coditions:\n\n0) Kernel built with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y\n\n1) A new passive FastOpen TCP socket is created.\n   This FO socket waits for an ACK coming from client to be a complete\n   ESTABLISHED one.\n2) A socket operation on this socket goes through lock_sock()\n   release_sock() dance.\n3) While the socket is owned by the user in step 2),\n   a retransmit of the SYN is received and stored in socket backlog.\n4) At release_sock() time, the socket backlog is processed while\n   in process context.\n5) A SYNACK packet is cooked in response of the SYN retransmit.\n6) -\u003e tcp_rtx_synack() is called in process context.\n\nBefore blamed commit, tcp_rtx_synack() was always called from BH handler,\nfrom a timer handler.\n\nFix this by using TCP_INC_STATS() \u0026 NET_INC_STATS()\nwhich do not assume caller is in non preemptible context.\n\n[1]\nBUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: epollpep/2180\ncaller is tcp_rtx_synack.part.0+0x36/0xc0\nCPU: 10 PID: 2180 Comm: epollpep Tainted: G           OE     5.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 #1  Debian 5.16.12-1~bpo11+1\nHardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MC-H8TRF/X11SCD-F, BIOS 1.7 11/23/2021\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x5e\n check_preemption_disabled+0xde/0xe0\n tcp_rtx_synack.part.0+0x36/0xc0\n tcp_rtx_synack+0x8d/0xa0\n ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x2e0/0x3e0\n ? apparmor_file_alloc_security+0x3b/0x1f0\n inet_rtx_syn_ack+0x16/0x30\n tcp_check_req+0x367/0x610\n tcp_rcv_state_process+0x91/0xf60\n ? get_nohz_timer_target+0x18/0x1a0\n ? lock_timer_base+0x61/0x80\n ? preempt_count_add+0x68/0xa0\n tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xbd/0x270\n __release_sock+0x6d/0xb0\n release_sock+0x2b/0x90\n sock_setsockopt+0x138/0x1140\n ? __sys_getsockname+0x7e/0xc0\n ? aa_sk_perm+0x3e/0x1a0\n __sys_setsockopt+0x198/0x1e0\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x21/0x30\n do_syscall_64+0x38/0xc0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae",
  "id": "GHSA-48pg-x75p-m28c",
  "modified": "2025-10-21T12:31:25Z",
  "published": "2025-10-21T12:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49372"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a0f7f84148445c9f02f226928803a870139d820"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a375c822497ed6ad6b5da0792a12a6f1af10c0b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3db889f883e65bbd3b1401279bfc1e9ed255c481"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58bd38cbc961fd799842b7be8c5222310f04b908"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88cd232146207ff1d41dededed5e77c0d4438113"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bdc28a8fb43cc476e33b11519235adb816ce00e8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c348b0f8d035fc4bdc040796889beec7218bd1b8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d05c2fdf8e10528bb6751bd95243e862d5402a9b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8e1bc6029acac796293310aacef7b7336f35b6a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…