ghsa-47rg-xchh-xj5g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:51
Modified
2022-05-17 04:51
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The bdrv_open function in Qemu 1.0 does not properly handle the failure of the mkstemp function, when in snapshot node, which allows local users to overwrite or read arbitrary files via a symlink attack on an unspecified temporary file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-2652"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-08-07T20:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The bdrv_open function in Qemu 1.0 does not properly handle the failure of the mkstemp function, when in snapshot node, which allows local users to overwrite or read arbitrary files via a symlink attack on an unspecified temporary file.",
"id": "GHSA-47rg-xchh-xj5g",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:51:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:51:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2652"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=eba25057b9a5e19d10ace2bc7716667a31297169"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git;a=commit;h=eba25057b9a5e19d10ace2bc7716667a31297169"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu-stable-0.15.git%3Ba=log"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu-stable-0.15.git;a=log"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00024.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50689"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2545"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53725"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1522-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…