ghsa-46r5-999x-h9xr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:51
Modified
2022-05-17 05:51
Details
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in MediaWiki before 1.6.11, 1.12.x before 1.12.2, and 1.13.x before 1.13.3, when Internet Explorer is used and uploads are enabled, or an SVG scripting browser is used and SVG uploads are enabled, allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by editing a wiki page.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-5250" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-12-19T17:30:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in MediaWiki before 1.6.11, 1.12.x before 1.12.2, and 1.13.x before 1.13.3, when Internet Explorer is used and uploads are enabled, or an SVG scripting browser is used and SVG uploads are enabled, allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by editing a wiki page.", "id": "GHSA-46r5-999x-h9xr", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:51:55Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:51:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5250" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-December/msg01256.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-December/msg01309.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-02/msg00002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-announce/2008-December/000080.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33133" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33349" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1901" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32844" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.