GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-455W-C45V-86RG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-11 13:45 – Updated: 2022-10-11 13:45
VLAI
Summary
fastify vulnerable to denial of service via malicious Content-Type
Details

Impact

An attacker can send an invalid Content-Type header that can cause the application to crash, leading to a possible Denial of Service attack. Only the v4.x line is affected.

(This was updated: upon a close inspection, v3.x is not affected after all).

Patches

Yes, update to > v4.8.0.

Workarounds

You can reject the malicious content types before the body parser enters in action.

  const badNames = Object.getOwnPropertyNames({}.__proto__)
  fastify.addHook('onRequest', async (req, reply) => {
    for (const badName of badNames) {
      if (req.headers['content-type'].indexOf(badName) > -1) {
        reply.code(415)
        throw new Error('Content type not supported')
      }
    }
  })

References

See the HackerOne report #1715536

For more information

Fastify security policy

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "fastify"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.8.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-39288"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-754"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-11T13:45:14Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-10-10T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nAn attacker can send an invalid `Content-Type` header that can cause the application to crash, leading to a possible Denial of Service attack. Only the v4.x line is affected.\n\n(This was updated: upon a close inspection, v3.x is not affected after all).\n\n### Patches\nYes, update to `\u003e v4.8.0`.\n\n### Workarounds\nYou can reject the malicious content types before the body parser enters in action.\n```js\n  const badNames = Object.getOwnPropertyNames({}.__proto__)\n  fastify.addHook(\u0027onRequest\u0027, async (req, reply) =\u003e {\n    for (const badName of badNames) {\n      if (req.headers[\u0027content-type\u0027].indexOf(badName) \u003e -1) {\n        reply.code(415)\n        throw new Error(\u0027Content type not supported\u0027)\n      }\n    }\n  })\n```\n\n### References\n\nSee the HackerOne report [#1715536](https://hackerone.com/bugs?report_id=1715536\u0026subject=fastify)\n\n### For more information\n[Fastify security policy](https://github.com/fastify/fastify/security/policy)\n",
  "id": "GHSA-455w-c45v-86rg",
  "modified": "2022-10-11T13:45:14Z",
  "published": "2022-10-11T13:45:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify/security/advisories/GHSA-455w-c45v-86rg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39288"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify/commit/fbb07e8dfad74c69cd4cd2211aedab87194618e3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify/security/policy"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/bugs?report_id=1715536\u0026subject=fastify"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "fastify vulnerable to denial of service via malicious Content-Type"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…