ghsa-444r-2xr3-rxhv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:11
Modified
2022-05-13 01:11
Details
The ServerTrustManager component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify basicConstraints and nameConstraints in X.509 certificate chains from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate chain.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2014-0363", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-295", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2014-04-30T10:49:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The ServerTrustManager component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify basicConstraints and nameConstraints in X.509 certificate chains from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate chain.", id: "GHSA-444r-2xr3-rxhv", modified: "2022-05-13T01:11:39Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:11:39Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0363", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://community.igniterealtime.org/blogs/ignite/2014/04/17/asmack-400-rc1-has-been-released", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://issues.igniterealtime.org/browse/SMACK-410", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1176.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/59290", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/59291", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/489228", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/67119", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.