ghsa-3pcq-2643-8rg5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:20
Modified
2022-10-14 12:00
Severity ?
Details
In exif_data_load_data_content of exif-data.c, there is a possible UBSAN abort due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-146428941
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-0198" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-06-11T15:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In exif_data_load_data_content of exif-data.c, there is a possible UBSAN abort due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-146428941", "id": "GHSA-3pcq-2643-8rg5", "modified": "2022-10-14T12:00:20Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:20:17Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0198" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/06/msg00020.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ELDZR6USD5PR34MRK2ZISLCYJ465FNKN" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SVBD5JRUQPN4LQHTAAJHA3MR5M7YTAC7" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202011-19" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2020-06-01" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4396-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.