ghsa-3m7r-w3xm-qwcj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:54
Modified
2022-05-14 02:54
Details
The ocsp_check function in rlm_eap_tls.c in FreeRADIUS 2.1.11, when OCSP is enabled, does not properly parse replies from OCSP responders, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by using the EAP-TLS protocol with a revoked X.509 client certificate.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-2701" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-287" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-08-04T02:45:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The ocsp_check function in rlm_eap_tls.c in FreeRADIUS 2.1.11, when OCSP is enabled, does not properly parse replies from OCSP responders, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by using the EAP-TLS protocol with a revoked X.509 client certificate.", "id": "GHSA-3m7r-w3xm-qwcj", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:54:58Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:54:58Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2701" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724815" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/68782" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.dfn-cert.de/informationen/Sicherheitsbulletins/dsb-2011-01.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/45425" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8325" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1025833" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/15/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/18/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/20/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/518974/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48880" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.