ghsa-3g9v-2x9v-4j4g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:42
Modified
2025-04-20 03:41
Severity ?
Details
In Wireshark through 2.0.13 and 2.2.x through 2.2.7, the openSAFETY dissector could crash or exhaust system memory. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-opensafety.c by adding length validation. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-9350.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-11411", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-07-18T21:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In Wireshark through 2.0.13 and 2.2.x through 2.2.7, the openSAFETY dissector could crash or exhaust system memory. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-opensafety.c by adding length validation. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-9350.", id: "GHSA-3g9v-2x9v-4j4g", modified: "2025-04-20T03:41:04Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:42:18Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11411", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13755", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a83a324acdfc07a0ca8b65e6ebaba3374ab19c76", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=a83a324acdfc07a0ca8b65e6ebaba3374ab19c76", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2017-28.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.