ghsa-3g8c-3p92-rjwr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-08-19 18:31
Modified
2025-08-19 18:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fix possible infinite loop in fib6_info_uses_dev()
fib6_info_uses_dev() seems to rely on RCU without an explicit protection.
Like the prior fix in rt6_nlmsg_size(), we need to make sure fib6_del_route() or fib6_add_rt2node() have not removed the anchor from the list, or we risk an infinite loop.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-38587" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-19T17:15:36Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv6: fix possible infinite loop in fib6_info_uses_dev()\n\nfib6_info_uses_dev() seems to rely on RCU without an explicit\nprotection.\n\nLike the prior fix in rt6_nlmsg_size(),\nwe need to make sure fib6_del_route() or fib6_add_rt2node()\nhave not removed the anchor from the list, or we risk an infinite loop.", "id": "GHSA-3g8c-3p92-rjwr", "modified": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z", "published": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38587" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16d21816c0918f8058b5fc14cbe8595d62046e2d" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cb6de8ee144a94ae7a40bdb32560329ab7276f0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc85e62394f008fa848c4ba02c936c735a3e8ef5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db65739d406c72776fbdbbc334be827ef05880d2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e09be457b71b983a085312ff9e981f51e4ed3211" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8d8ce1b515a0a6af72b30502670a406cfb75073" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…