ghsa-3g8c-3p92-rjwr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-08-19 18:31
Modified
2025-08-19 18:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: fix possible infinite loop in fib6_info_uses_dev()
fib6_info_uses_dev() seems to rely on RCU without an explicit protection.
Like the prior fix in rt6_nlmsg_size(), we need to make sure fib6_del_route() or fib6_add_rt2node() have not removed the anchor from the list, or we risk an infinite loop.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-38587"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-19T17:15:36Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv6: fix possible infinite loop in fib6_info_uses_dev()\n\nfib6_info_uses_dev() seems to rely on RCU without an explicit\nprotection.\n\nLike the prior fix in rt6_nlmsg_size(),\nwe need to make sure fib6_del_route() or fib6_add_rt2node()\nhave not removed the anchor from the list, or we risk an infinite loop.",
"id": "GHSA-3g8c-3p92-rjwr",
"modified": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z",
"published": "2025-08-19T18:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16d21816c0918f8058b5fc14cbe8595d62046e2d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cb6de8ee144a94ae7a40bdb32560329ab7276f0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc85e62394f008fa848c4ba02c936c735a3e8ef5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db65739d406c72776fbdbbc334be827ef05880d2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e09be457b71b983a085312ff9e981f51e4ed3211"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8d8ce1b515a0a6af72b30502670a406cfb75073"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…