ghsa-37qc-prgq-xwcm
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections
When releasing a socket in ax25_release(), we call netdev_put() to decrease the refcount on the associated ax.25 device. However, the execution path for accepting an incoming connection never calls netdev_hold(). This imbalance leads to refcount errors, and ultimately to kernel crashes.
A typical call trace for the above situation will start with one of the following errors:
refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
And will then have a trace like:
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? show_regs+0x64/0x70
? __warn+0x83/0x120
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
? report_bug+0x158/0x190
? prb_read_valid+0x20/0x30
? handle_bug+0x3e/0x70
? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100
ax25_release+0x2ad/0x360
__sock_release+0x35/0xa0
sock_close+0x19/0x20
[...]
On reboot (or any attempt to remove the interface), the kernel gets stuck in an infinite loop:
unregister_netdevice: waiting for ax0 to become free. Usage count = 0
This patch corrects these issues by ensuring that we call netdev_hold() and ax25_dev_hold() for new connections in ax25_accept(). This makes the logic leading to ax25_accept() match the logic for ax25_bind(): in both cases we increment the refcount, which is ultimately decremented in ax25_release().
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-40910" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-12T13:15:14Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nax25: Fix refcount imbalance on inbound connections\n\nWhen releasing a socket in ax25_release(), we call netdev_put() to\ndecrease the refcount on the associated ax.25 device. However, the\nexecution path for accepting an incoming connection never calls\nnetdev_hold(). This imbalance leads to refcount errors, and ultimately\nto kernel crashes.\n\nA typical call trace for the above situation will start with one of the\nfollowing errors:\n\n refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n\nAnd will then have a trace like:\n\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? show_regs+0x64/0x70\n ? __warn+0x83/0x120\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ? report_bug+0x158/0x190\n ? prb_read_valid+0x20/0x30\n ? handle_bug+0x3e/0x70\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xb2/0x100\n ax25_release+0x2ad/0x360\n __sock_release+0x35/0xa0\n sock_close+0x19/0x20\n [...]\n\nOn reboot (or any attempt to remove the interface), the kernel gets\nstuck in an infinite loop:\n\n unregister_netdevice: waiting for ax0 to become free. Usage count = 0\n\nThis patch corrects these issues by ensuring that we call netdev_hold()\nand ax25_dev_hold() for new connections in ax25_accept(). This makes the\nlogic leading to ax25_accept() match the logic for ax25_bind(): in both\ncases we increment the refcount, which is ultimately decremented in\nax25_release().", "id": "GHSA-37qc-prgq-xwcm", "modified": "2024-08-29T15:30:31Z", "published": "2024-07-12T15:31:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40910" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c34fb0bd4a4237592c5ecb5b2e2531900c55774" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52100fd74ad07b53a4666feafff1cd11436362d3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a723a6c8d4831cc8e2c7b0c9f3f0c010d4671964" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4df9d6c8d4e4c818252b0419c2165d66eabd4eb" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.