ghsa-34mm-3fgq-qjxq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
Details
It was discovered systemd does not correctly check the content of PIDFile files before using it to kill processes. When a service is run from an unprivileged user (e.g. User field set in the service file), a local attacker who is able to write to the PIDFile of the mentioned service may use this flaw to trick systemd into killing other services and/or privileged processes. Versions before v237 are vulnerable.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-16888", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-269", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-01-14T22:29:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "It was discovered systemd does not correctly check the content of PIDFile files before using it to kill processes. When a service is run from an unprivileged user (e.g. User field set in the service file), a local attacker who is able to write to the PIDFile of the mentioned service may use this flaw to trick systemd into killing other services and/or privileged processes. Versions before v237 are vulnerable.", id: "GHSA-34mm-3fgq-qjxq", modified: "2022-05-13T01:04:10Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:04:10Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16888", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2091", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16888", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5960a34a524848cd722fd7ab7e2227eac10107b0f90d9d1e9c3caa74@%3Cuser.cassandra.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190307-0007", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4269-1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.