ghsa-32x4-wf82-frg6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:11
Modified
2022-05-14 02:11
Details
The CIP dissector in Wireshark 1.4.x before 1.4.15, 1.6.x before 1.6.10, and 1.8.x before 1.8.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a malformed packet.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-4291" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-08-16T10:38:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "The CIP dissector in Wireshark 1.4.x before 1.4.15, 1.6.x before 1.6.10, and 1.8.x before 1.8.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a malformed packet.", "id": "GHSA-32x4-wf82-frg6", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:11:28Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:11:28Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4291" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/multiple_vulnerabilities_in_wireshark3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7570" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/15514562" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A15813" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-08/msg00033.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0125.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50276" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/51363" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54425" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201308-05.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55035" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-20.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.