ghsa-32cw-4h2j-22vc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:26
Modified
2022-04-29 01:26
Details
Buffer overflow in the SMB capability for Microsoft Windows XP, 2000, and NT allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via an SMB packet that specifies a smaller buffer length than is required.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2003-0345" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2003-08-18T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the SMB capability for Microsoft Windows XP, 2000, and NT allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via an SMB packet that specifies a smaller buffer length than is required.", "id": "GHSA-32cw-4h2j-22vc", "modified": "2022-04-29T01:26:16Z", "published": "2022-04-29T01:26:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0345" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2003/ms03-024" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/12544" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A118" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A146" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A3391" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/9225" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1007154" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/337764" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8152" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.