ghsa-22vq-wcg7-jq7r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:24
Modified
2022-05-13 01:24
Severity ?
Details
The socket implementation in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.35 does not properly manage a backlog of received packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a large amount of network traffic, related to the sk_add_backlog function and the sk_rmem_alloc socket field. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-4251.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-4805" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-400" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-05-26T16:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The socket implementation in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.35 does not properly manage a backlog of received packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a large amount of network traffic, related to the sk_add_backlog function and the sk_rmem_alloc socket field. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-4251.", "id": "GHSA-22vq-wcg7-jq7r", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:24:34Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:24:34Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4805" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657303" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/3/3/6271093/thread" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.35" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46637" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.