fkie_cve-2025-8850
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-10-30 20:15
Modified
2025-11-19 15:27
Severity ?
Summary
In danny-avila/librechat version 0.7.9, there is an insecure API design issue in the 2-Factor Authentication (2FA) flow. The system allows users to disable 2FA without requiring a valid OTP or backup code, bypassing the intended verification process. This vulnerability occurs because the backend does not properly validate the OTP or backup code when the API endpoint '/api/auth/2fa/disable' is directly accessed. This flaw can be exploited by authenticated users to weaken the security of their own accounts, although it does not lead to full account compromise.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@huntr.dev | https://github.com/danny-avila/librechat/commit/7e4c8a5d0d2dbe5bf8fd272ff6acafb27d24744f | Patch | |
| security@huntr.dev | https://huntr.com/bounties/8e615709-f4de-41e2-b194-f0d91ed7c75e | Third Party Advisory, Exploit, Patch |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:librechat:librechat:0.7.9:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "74A99A2E-023B-4C39-9696-61DA01C9284E",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In danny-avila/librechat version 0.7.9, there is an insecure API design issue in the 2-Factor Authentication (2FA) flow. The system allows users to disable 2FA without requiring a valid OTP or backup code, bypassing the intended verification process. This vulnerability occurs because the backend does not properly validate the OTP or backup code when the API endpoint \u0027/api/auth/2fa/disable\u0027 is directly accessed. This flaw can be exploited by authenticated users to weaken the security of their own accounts, although it does not lead to full account compromise."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-8850",
"lastModified": "2025-11-19T15:27:48.057",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "security@huntr.dev",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-10-30T20:15:39.633",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@huntr.dev",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/librechat/commit/7e4c8a5d0d2dbe5bf8fd272ff6acafb27d24744f"
},
{
"source": "security@huntr.dev",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"Exploit",
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/8e615709-f4de-41e2-b194-f0d91ed7c75e"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@huntr.dev",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-440"
}
],
"source": "security@huntr.dev",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…