fkie_cve-2025-68227
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-12-16 14:15
Modified
2025-12-18 15:08
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: Fix proto fallback detection with BPF
The sockmap feature allows bpf syscall from userspace, or based
on bpf sockops, replacing the sk_prot of sockets during protocol stack
processing with sockmap's custom read/write interfaces.
'''
tcp_rcv_state_process()
syn_recv_sock()/subflow_syn_recv_sock()
tcp_init_transfer(BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB)
bpf_skops_established <== sockops
bpf_sock_map_update(sk) <== call bpf helper
tcp_bpf_update_proto() <== update sk_prot
'''
When the server has MPTCP enabled but the client sends a TCP SYN
without MPTCP, subflow_syn_recv_sock() performs a fallback on the
subflow, replacing the subflow sk's sk_prot with the native sk_prot.
'''
subflow_syn_recv_sock()
subflow_ulp_fallback()
subflow_drop_ctx()
mptcp_subflow_ops_undo_override()
'''
Then, this subflow can be normally used by sockmap, which replaces the
native sk_prot with sockmap's custom sk_prot. The issue occurs when the
user executes accept::mptcp_stream_accept::mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops().
Here, it uses sk->sk_prot to compare with the native sk_prot, but this
is incorrect when sockmap is used, as we may incorrectly set
sk->sk_socket->ops.
This fix uses the more generic sk_family for the comparison instead.
Additionally, this also prevents a WARNING from occurring:
result from ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 337 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:68 mptcp_stream_accept \
(net/mptcp/protocol.c:4005)
Modules linked in:
...
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<TASK>
do_accept (net/socket.c:1989)
__sys_accept4 (net/socket.c:2028 net/socket.c:2057)
__x64_sys_accept (net/socket.c:2067)
x64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:41)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
RIP: 0033:0x7f87ac92b83d
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: Fix proto fallback detection with BPF\n\nThe sockmap feature allows bpf syscall from userspace, or based\non bpf sockops, replacing the sk_prot of sockets during protocol stack\nprocessing with sockmap\u0027s custom read/write interfaces.\n\u0027\u0027\u0027\ntcp_rcv_state_process()\n syn_recv_sock()/subflow_syn_recv_sock()\n tcp_init_transfer(BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB)\n bpf_skops_established \u003c== sockops\n bpf_sock_map_update(sk) \u003c== call bpf helper\n tcp_bpf_update_proto() \u003c== update sk_prot\n\u0027\u0027\u0027\n\nWhen the server has MPTCP enabled but the client sends a TCP SYN\nwithout MPTCP, subflow_syn_recv_sock() performs a fallback on the\nsubflow, replacing the subflow sk\u0027s sk_prot with the native sk_prot.\n\u0027\u0027\u0027\nsubflow_syn_recv_sock()\n subflow_ulp_fallback()\n subflow_drop_ctx()\n mptcp_subflow_ops_undo_override()\n\u0027\u0027\u0027\n\nThen, this subflow can be normally used by sockmap, which replaces the\nnative sk_prot with sockmap\u0027s custom sk_prot. The issue occurs when the\nuser executes accept::mptcp_stream_accept::mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops().\nHere, it uses sk-\u003esk_prot to compare with the native sk_prot, but this\nis incorrect when sockmap is used, as we may incorrectly set\nsk-\u003esk_socket-\u003eops.\n\nThis fix uses the more generic sk_family for the comparison instead.\n\nAdditionally, this also prevents a WARNING from occurring:\n\nresult from ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 337 at net/mptcp/protocol.c:68 mptcp_stream_accept \\\n(net/mptcp/protocol.c:4005)\nModules linked in:\n...\n\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n\u003cTASK\u003e\ndo_accept (net/socket.c:1989)\n__sys_accept4 (net/socket.c:2028 net/socket.c:2057)\n__x64_sys_accept (net/socket.c:2067)\nx64_sys_call (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:41)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\nRIP: 0033:0x7f87ac92b83d\n\n---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-68227",
"lastModified": "2025-12-18T15:08:06.237",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-12-16T14:15:56.307",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/037cc50589643342d69185b663ecf9d26cce91e8"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a0d5c74af9b6ba9ffdf1172de5a1a6df5922a00"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/344974ea1a3ca30e4920687b0091bda4438cebdb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ee8f015eb47907745e2070184a8ab1e442ac3c4"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/92c4092fe012ecdfa5fb05d394f1c1d8f91ad81c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9b1980b6f23fa30bf12add19f37c7458625099eb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c77b3b79a92e3345aa1ee296180d1af4e7031f8f"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…