fkie_cve-2025-68224
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-12-16 14:15
Modified
2025-12-18 15:08
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: core: Fix a regression triggered by scsi_host_busy()
Commit 995412e23bb2 ("blk-mq: Replace tags->lock with SRCU for tag
iterators") introduced the following regression:
Call trace:
__srcu_read_lock+0x30/0x80 (P)
blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter+0x44/0x300
scsi_host_busy+0x38/0x70
ufshcd_print_host_state+0x34/0x1bc
ufshcd_link_startup.constprop.0+0xe4/0x2e0
ufshcd_init+0x944/0xf80
ufshcd_pltfrm_init+0x504/0x820
ufs_rockchip_probe+0x2c/0x88
platform_probe+0x5c/0xa4
really_probe+0xc0/0x38c
__driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x150
driver_probe_device+0x40/0x120
__driver_attach+0xc8/0x1e0
bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xdc
driver_attach+0x24/0x30
bus_add_driver+0x110/0x230
driver_register+0x68/0x130
__platform_driver_register+0x20/0x2c
ufs_rockchip_pltform_init+0x1c/0x28
do_one_initcall+0x60/0x1e0
kernel_init_freeable+0x248/0x2c4
kernel_init+0x20/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Fix this regression by making scsi_host_busy() check whether the SCSI
host tag set has already been initialized. tag_set->ops is set by
scsi_mq_setup_tags() just before blk_mq_alloc_tag_set() is called. This
fix is based on the assumption that scsi_host_busy() and
scsi_mq_setup_tags() calls are serialized. This is the case in the UFS
driver.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: core: Fix a regression triggered by scsi_host_busy()\n\nCommit 995412e23bb2 (\"blk-mq: Replace tags-\u003elock with SRCU for tag\niterators\") introduced the following regression:\n\nCall trace:\n __srcu_read_lock+0x30/0x80 (P)\n blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter+0x44/0x300\n scsi_host_busy+0x38/0x70\n ufshcd_print_host_state+0x34/0x1bc\n ufshcd_link_startup.constprop.0+0xe4/0x2e0\n ufshcd_init+0x944/0xf80\n ufshcd_pltfrm_init+0x504/0x820\n ufs_rockchip_probe+0x2c/0x88\n platform_probe+0x5c/0xa4\n really_probe+0xc0/0x38c\n __driver_probe_device+0x7c/0x150\n driver_probe_device+0x40/0x120\n __driver_attach+0xc8/0x1e0\n bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xdc\n driver_attach+0x24/0x30\n bus_add_driver+0x110/0x230\n driver_register+0x68/0x130\n __platform_driver_register+0x20/0x2c\n ufs_rockchip_pltform_init+0x1c/0x28\n do_one_initcall+0x60/0x1e0\n kernel_init_freeable+0x248/0x2c4\n kernel_init+0x20/0x140\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n\nFix this regression by making scsi_host_busy() check whether the SCSI\nhost tag set has already been initialized. tag_set-\u003eops is set by\nscsi_mq_setup_tags() just before blk_mq_alloc_tag_set() is called. This\nfix is based on the assumption that scsi_host_busy() and\nscsi_mq_setup_tags() calls are serialized. This is the case in the UFS\ndriver."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-68224",
"lastModified": "2025-12-18T15:08:06.237",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-12-16T14:15:55.767",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/143257917b836bd5fc434063030fda199e249624"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47c8b35a1f1d53aac156480cea0a0c5c82919f03"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d778778b40bcdfd9f8817fea1ec6ebcbec69c0a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/804b5b8e3545445450387ae6891262c421c49304"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0b7780602b1b196f47e527fec82166a7e67c4d0"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d579f496681c5136d63cb4fbb685511227e73602"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e208fb1660c4a43f06b7b66c3ff22dde84ec3990"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…