fkie_cve-2025-68206
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-12-16 14:15
Modified
2025-12-18 15:08
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections Sequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes. due to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control connection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected seq / ack_seq. The easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode. Example ruleset: table inet ftp_nat { ct helper ftp_helper { type "ftp" protocol tcp l3proto inet } chain prerouting { type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept; tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set "ftp_helper" } } table ip nat { chain prerouting { type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept; tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map { 192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 } } chain postrouting { type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept; tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map { 192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 } } } Note that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup. The inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing check in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem. Topoloy: +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | <-> | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 | +-------------------+ +----------------------------------+ | +-----------------------+ | Client: 192.168.100.2 | +-----------------------+ ftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case: Connected to 192.168.100.1. [..] ftp> epsv EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. ftp> ls 227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. Kernel logs: Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41 [..] __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat] nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp] help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp] nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0 .. Fix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned to a connection that has a nat binding.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: nft_ct: add seqadj extension for natted connections\n\nSequence adjustment may be required for FTP traffic with PASV/EPSV modes.\ndue to need to re-write packet payload (IP, port) on the ftp control\nconnection. This can require changes to the TCP length and expected\nseq / ack_seq.\n\nThe easiest way to reproduce this issue is with PASV mode.\nExample ruleset:\ntable inet ftp_nat {\n        ct helper ftp_helper {\n                type \"ftp\" protocol tcp\n                l3proto inet\n        }\n\n        chain prerouting {\n                type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept;\n                tcp dport 21 ct state new ct helper set \"ftp_helper\"\n        }\n}\ntable ip nat {\n        chain prerouting {\n                type nat hook prerouting priority -100; policy accept;\n                tcp dport 21 dnat ip prefix to ip daddr map {\n\t\t\t192.168.100.1 : 192.168.13.2/32 }\n        }\n\n        chain postrouting {\n                type nat hook postrouting priority 100 ; policy accept;\n                tcp sport 21 snat ip prefix to ip saddr map {\n\t\t\t192.168.13.2 : 192.168.100.1/32 }\n        }\n}\n\nNote that the ftp helper gets assigned *after* the dnat setup.\n\nThe inverse (nat after helper assign) is handled by an existing\ncheck in nf_nat_setup_info() and will not show the problem.\n\nTopoloy:\n\n +-------------------+     +----------------------------------+\n | FTP: 192.168.13.2 | \u003c-\u003e | NAT: 192.168.13.3, 192.168.100.1 |\n +-------------------+     +----------------------------------+\n                                      |\n                         +-----------------------+\n                         | Client: 192.168.100.2 |\n                         +-----------------------+\n\nftp nat changes do not work as expected in this case:\nConnected to 192.168.100.1.\n[..]\nftp\u003e epsv\nEPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off.\nftp\u003e ls\n227 Entering passive mode (192,168,100,1,209,129).\n421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection.\n\nKernel logs:\nMissing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c:41\n[..]\n __nf_nat_mangle_tcp_packet+0x100/0x160 [nf_nat]\n nf_nat_ftp+0x142/0x280 [nf_nat_ftp]\n help+0x4d1/0x880 [nf_conntrack_ftp]\n nf_confirm+0x122/0x2e0 [nf_conntrack]\n nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0\n ..\n\nFix this by adding the required extension when a conntrack helper is assigned\nto a connection that has a nat binding."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-68206",
  "lastModified": "2025-12-18T15:08:25.907",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-12-16T14:15:53.487",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b52d89cbbb0dbe3e948d8d9a91e704316dccfe6"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90918e3b6404c2a37837b8f11692471b4c512de2"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…