fkie_cve-2025-68203
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-12-16 14:15
Modified
2025-12-18 15:08
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix lock warning in amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process Fix a potential deadlock caused by inconsistent spinlock usage between interrupt and process contexts in the userq fence driver. The issue occurs when amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process() is called from both: - Interrupt context: gfx_v11_0_eop_irq() -> amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process() - Process context: amdgpu_eviction_fence_suspend_worker() -> amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_force_completion() -> amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process() In interrupt context, the spinlock was acquired without disabling interrupts, leaving it in {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state. When the same lock is acquired in process context, the kernel detects inconsistent locking since the process context acquisition would enable interrupts while holding a lock previously acquired in interrupt context. Kernel log shows: [ 4039.310790] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 4039.310804] kworker/7:2/409 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [ 4039.310818] ffff9284e1bed000 (&fence_drv->fence_list_lock){?...}-{3:3}, [ 4039.310993] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 4039.311004] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x300 [ 4039.311018] _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 4039.311031] amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process.part.0+0x30/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 4039.311146] amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process+0x17/0x30 [amdgpu] [ 4039.311257] gfx_v11_0_eop_irq+0x132/0x170 [amdgpu] Fix by using spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() to properly manage interrupt state regardless of calling context. (cherry picked from commit ded3ad780cf97a04927773c4600823b84f7f3cc2)
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: fix lock warning in amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process\n\nFix a potential deadlock caused by inconsistent spinlock usage\nbetween interrupt and process contexts in the userq fence driver.\n\nThe issue occurs when amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process() is called\nfrom both:\n- Interrupt context: gfx_v11_0_eop_irq() -\u003e amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process()\n- Process context: amdgpu_eviction_fence_suspend_worker() -\u003e\n  amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_force_completion() -\u003e amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process()\n\nIn interrupt context, the spinlock was acquired without disabling\ninterrupts, leaving it in {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state. When the same lock\nis acquired in process context, the kernel detects inconsistent\nlocking since the process context acquisition would enable interrupts\nwhile holding a lock previously acquired in interrupt context.\n\nKernel log shows:\n[ 4039.310790] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -\u003e {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.\n[ 4039.310804] kworker/7:2/409 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:\n[ 4039.310818] ffff9284e1bed000 (\u0026fence_drv-\u003efence_list_lock){?...}-{3:3},\n[ 4039.310993] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:\n[ 4039.311004]   lock_acquire+0xc6/0x300\n[ 4039.311018]   _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x80\n[ 4039.311031]   amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process.part.0+0x30/0x180 [amdgpu]\n[ 4039.311146]   amdgpu_userq_fence_driver_process+0x17/0x30 [amdgpu]\n[ 4039.311257]   gfx_v11_0_eop_irq+0x132/0x170 [amdgpu]\n\nFix by using spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_unlock_irqrestore() to properly\nmanage interrupt state regardless of calling context.\n\n(cherry picked from commit ded3ad780cf97a04927773c4600823b84f7f3cc2)"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-68203",
  "lastModified": "2025-12-18T15:08:25.907",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-12-16T14:15:53.143",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ad70a06d7e91c378b346a3718c81abb50a74b74"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6623c5f9fd877868fba133b4ae4dab0052e82dad"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…