fkie_cve-2025-64459
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-11-05 15:15
Modified
2025-11-10 18:25
Severity ?
9.1 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Summary
An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8. The methods `QuerySet.filter()`, `QuerySet.exclude()`, and `QuerySet.get()`, and the class `Q()`, are subject to SQL injection when using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the `_connector` argument. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank cyberstan for reporting this issue.
References
6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/Vendor Advisory
6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92https://groups.google.com/g/django-announceMailing List
6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2025/nov/05/security-releases/Vendor Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://shivasurya.me/security/django/2025/11/07/django-sql-injection-CVE-2025-64459.htmlExploit, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
djangoproject django *
djangoproject django *
djangoproject django *


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5FC7EBE0-A60A-4083-9FB7-E4ADCD2B5F37",
              "versionEndExcluding": "4.2.26",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "9F3A5471-02DB-428E-815E-516057A901FF",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.1.14",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:djangoproject:django:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F56E9016-F93A-4DAE-8070-D3A4909F00A4",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.2.8",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8.\nThe methods `QuerySet.filter()`, `QuerySet.exclude()`, and `QuerySet.get()`, and the class `Q()`, are subject to SQL injection when using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the `_connector` argument.\nEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\nDjango would like to thank cyberstan for reporting this issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se descubri\u00f3 un problema en 5.1 anterior a 5.1.14, 4.2 anterior a 4.2.26 y 5.2 anterior a 5.2.8. Los m\u00e9todos \u0027QuerySet.filter()\u0027, \u0027QuerySet.exclude()\u0027 y \u0027QuerySet.get()\u0027, y la clase \u0027Q()\u0027, est\u00e1n sujetos a inyecci\u00f3n SQL cuando se utiliza un diccionario adecuadamente dise\u00f1ado, con expansi\u00f3n de diccionario, como argumento \u0027_connector\u0027. Series anteriores de Django sin soporte (como 5.0.x, 4.1.x y 3.2.x) no fueron evaluadas y tambi\u00e9n pueden verse afectadas. Django desea agradecer a cyberstan por informar de este problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-64459",
  "lastModified": "2025-11-10T18:25:59.883",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 9.1,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-11-05T15:15:41.080",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
    },
    {
      "source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
    },
    {
      "source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2025/nov/05/security-releases/"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://shivasurya.me/security/django/2025/11/07/django-sql-injection-CVE-2025-64459.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.