fkie_cve-2025-43708
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-04-17 01:15
Modified
2025-09-24 00:51
Severity ?
3.3 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
VisiCut 2.1 allows stack consumption via an XML document with nested set elements, as demonstrated by a java.util.HashMap StackOverflowError when reference='../../../set/set[2]' is used, aka an "insecure deserialization" issue.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/Gelcon/PoC-of-VisiCut2_1-Stack-Overflow-VulExploit, Third Party Advisory
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/t-oster/VisiCutProduct
cve@mitre.orghttps://visicut.orgProduct
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
visicut visicut 2.1


To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:visicut:visicut:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "0F8D48DD-9FFD-430E-AE40-BBD22CA1081D",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "VisiCut 2.1 allows stack consumption via an XML document with nested set elements, as demonstrated by a java.util.HashMap StackOverflowError when reference=\u0027../../../set/set[2]\u0027 is used, aka an \"insecure deserialization\" issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "VisiCut 2.1 permite el consumo de pila a trav\u00e9s de un documento XML con elementos de conjunto anidados, como lo demuestra un java.util.HashMap StackOverflowError cuando se utiliza reference=\u0027../../../set/set[2]\u0027, tambi\u00e9n conocido como un problema de \"deserializaci\u00f3n insegura\"."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-43708",
  "lastModified": "2025-09-24T00:51:03.900",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 3.3,
          "baseSeverity": "LOW",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "cve@mitre.org",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-17T01:15:46.707",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/Gelcon/PoC-of-VisiCut2_1-Stack-Overflow-Vul"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/t-oster/VisiCut"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://visicut.org"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-674"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.