FKIE_CVE-2025-4203

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-10-25 07:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:32
Severity
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to error‐based or time-based SQL Injection via the get_members() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.8 due to missing integer validation on the 'offset' and 'row_count' parameters. The function blindly interpolates 'row_count' into a 'LIMIT offset,row_count' clause using esc_sql() rather than enforcing numeric values. MySQL 5.x’s grammar allows a 'PROCEDURE ANALYSE' clause immediately after a LIMIT clause. Unauthenticated attackers controlling 'row_count' can append a stored‐procedure call, enabling error‐based or time‐based blind SQL injection that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpforo/tags/2.4.5/classes/Members.php#L1557
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpforo/tags/2.4.9/classes/Members.php#L1557
security@wordfence.comhttps://wordpress.org/plugins/wpforo/#developers
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/bc406e8a-c4eb-45c3-a53c-37644e0dabfa?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "wpForo Forum",
          "vendor": "tomdever",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to error\u2010based or time-based SQL Injection via the get_members() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.8 due to missing integer validation on the \u0027offset\u0027 and \u0027row_count\u0027 parameters. The function blindly interpolates \u0027row_count\u0027 into a \u0027LIMIT offset,row_count\u0027 clause using esc_sql() rather than enforcing numeric values. MySQL 5.x\u2019s grammar allows a \u0027PROCEDURE ANALYSE\u0027 clause immediately after a LIMIT clause. Unauthenticated attackers controlling \u0027row_count\u0027 can append a stored\u2010procedure call, enabling error\u2010based or time\u2010based blind SQL injection that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-4203",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:32:45.757",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-4203",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-10-27T15:37:16.653419Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-10-25T07:15:41.130",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpforo/tags/2.4.5/classes/Members.php#L1557"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wpforo/tags/2.4.9/classes/Members.php#L1557"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wpforo/#developers"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/bc406e8a-c4eb-45c3-a53c-37644e0dabfa?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.