fkie_cve-2025-40130
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-11-12 11:15
Modified
2025-11-12 16:19
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: ufs: core: Fix data race in CPU latency PM QoS request handling The cpu_latency_qos_add/remove/update_request interfaces lack internal synchronization by design, requiring the caller to ensure thread safety. The current implementation relies on the 'pm_qos_enabled' flag, which is insufficient to prevent concurrent access and cannot serve as a proper synchronization mechanism. This has led to data races and list corruption issues. A typical race condition call trace is: [Thread A] ufshcd_pm_qos_exit() --> cpu_latency_qos_remove_request() --> cpu_latency_qos_apply(); --> pm_qos_update_target() --> plist_del <--(1) delete plist node --> memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req)); --> hba->pm_qos_enabled = false; [Thread B] ufshcd_devfreq_target --> ufshcd_devfreq_scale --> ufshcd_scale_clks --> ufshcd_pm_qos_update <--(2) pm_qos_enabled is true --> cpu_latency_qos_update_request --> pm_qos_update_target --> plist_del <--(3) plist node use-after-free Introduces a dedicated mutex to serialize PM QoS operations, preventing data races and ensuring safe access to PM QoS resources, including sysfs interface reads.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: ufs: core: Fix data race in CPU latency PM QoS request handling\n\nThe cpu_latency_qos_add/remove/update_request interfaces lack internal\nsynchronization by design, requiring the caller to ensure thread safety.\nThe current implementation relies on the \u0027pm_qos_enabled\u0027 flag, which is\ninsufficient to prevent concurrent access and cannot serve as a proper\nsynchronization mechanism. This has led to data races and list\ncorruption issues.\n\nA typical race condition call trace is:\n\n[Thread A]\nufshcd_pm_qos_exit()\n  --\u003e cpu_latency_qos_remove_request()\n    --\u003e cpu_latency_qos_apply();\n      --\u003e pm_qos_update_target()\n        --\u003e plist_del              \u003c--(1) delete plist node\n    --\u003e memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req));\n  --\u003e hba-\u003epm_qos_enabled = false;\n\n[Thread B]\nufshcd_devfreq_target\n  --\u003e ufshcd_devfreq_scale\n    --\u003e ufshcd_scale_clks\n      --\u003e ufshcd_pm_qos_update     \u003c--(2) pm_qos_enabled is true\n        --\u003e cpu_latency_qos_update_request\n          --\u003e pm_qos_update_target\n            --\u003e plist_del          \u003c--(3) plist node use-after-free\n\nIntroduces a dedicated mutex to serialize PM QoS operations, preventing\ndata races and ensuring safe access to PM QoS resources, including sysfs\ninterface reads."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-40130",
  "lastModified": "2025-11-12T16:19:12.850",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-11-12T11:15:42.637",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79dde5f7dc7c038eec903745dc1550cd4139980e"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9df61afb8d23c475f1be3c714da2c34c156ab01"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…