fkie_cve-2025-23195
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-21 22:15
Modified
2025-01-22 15:15
Summary
An XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists in the Ambari/Oozie project, allowing an attacker to inject malicious XML entities. This vulnerability occurs due to insecure parsing of XML input using the `DocumentBuilderFactory` class without disabling external entity resolution. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to read arbitrary files on the server or perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. The issue has been fixed in both Ambari 2.7.9 and the trunk branch.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version



{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "An XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists in the Ambari/Oozie \nproject, allowing an attacker to inject malicious XML entities. This \nvulnerability occurs due to insecure parsing of XML input using the \n`DocumentBuilderFactory` class without disabling external entity \nresolution. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to read arbitrary\n files on the server or perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) \nattacks. The issue has been fixed in both Ambari 2.7.9 and the trunk \nbranch.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Existe una vulnerabilidad de entidad externa XML (XXE) en el proyecto Ambari/Oozie, que permite a un atacante inyectar entidades XML maliciosas. Esta vulnerabilidad se produce debido a un análisis inseguro de la entrada XML mediante la clase `DocumentBuilderFactory` sin deshabilitar la resolución de entidades externas. Un atacante puede aprovechar esta vulnerabilidad para leer archivos arbitrarios en el servidor o realizar ataques Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). El problema se ha solucionado tanto en Ambari 2.7.9 como en la rama troncal.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2025-23195",
   lastModified: "2025-01-22T15:15:15.237",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "NONE",
               baseScore: 7.5,
               baseSeverity: "HIGH",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 3.9,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-01-21T22:15:12.863",
   references: [
      {
         source: "security@apache.org",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/hsb6mvxd7g37dq1ygtd0pd88gs9tfcwq",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/21/7",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "security@apache.org",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-611",
            },
         ],
         source: "security@apache.org",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.