fkie_cve-2025-21881
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-03-27 15:15
Modified
2025-03-27 16:45
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
uprobes: Reject the shared zeropage in uprobe_write_opcode()
We triggered the following crash in syzkaller tests:
BUG: Bad page state in process syz.7.38 pfn:1eff3
page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1eff3
flags: 0x3fffff00004004(referenced|reserved|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
raw: 003fffff00004004 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe 0000000000000000
page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50
bad_page+0x69/0xf0
free_unref_page_prepare+0x401/0x500
free_unref_page+0x6d/0x1b0
uprobe_write_opcode+0x460/0x8e0
install_breakpoint.part.0+0x51/0x80
register_for_each_vma+0x1d9/0x2b0
__uprobe_register+0x245/0x300
bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach+0x29b/0x4f0
link_create+0x1e2/0x280
__sys_bpf+0x75f/0xac0
__x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x56/0x100
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2
BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000452453e0 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-1
The following syzkaller test case can be used to reproduce:
r2 = creat(&(0x7f0000000000)='./file0\x00', 0x8)
write$nbd(r2, &(0x7f0000000580)=ANY=[], 0x10)
r4 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file0\x00', 0x42, 0x0)
mmap$IORING_OFF_SQ_RING(&(0x7f0000ffd000/0x3000)=nil, 0x3000, 0x0, 0x12, r4, 0x0)
r5 = userfaultfd(0x80801)
ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r5, 0xc018aa3f, &(0x7f0000000040)={0xaa, 0x20})
r6 = userfaultfd(0x80801)
ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r6, 0xc018aa3f, &(0x7f0000000140))
ioctl$UFFDIO_REGISTER(r6, 0xc020aa00, &(0x7f0000000100)={{&(0x7f0000ffc000/0x4000)=nil, 0x4000}, 0x2})
ioctl$UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE(r5, 0xc020aa04, &(0x7f0000000000)={{&(0x7f0000ffd000/0x1000)=nil, 0x1000}})
r7 = bpf$PROG_LOAD(0x5, &(0x7f0000000140)={0x2, 0x3, &(0x7f0000000200)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="1800000000120000000000000000000095"], &(0x7f0000000000)='GPL\x00', 0x7, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, @fallback=0x30, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0, @void, @value}, 0x94)
bpf$BPF_LINK_CREATE_XDP(0x1c, &(0x7f0000000040)={r7, 0x0, 0x30, 0x1e, @val=@uprobe_multi={&(0x7f0000000080)='./file0\x00', &(0x7f0000000100)=[0x2], 0x0, 0x0, 0x1}}, 0x40)
The cause is that zero pfn is set to the PTE without increasing the RSS
count in mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage() and the refcount of zero folio does
not increase accordingly. Then, the operation on the same pfn is performed
in uprobe_write_opcode()->__replace_page() to unconditional decrease the
RSS count and old_folio's refcount.
Therefore, two bugs are introduced:
1. The RSS count is incorrect, when process exit, the check_mm() report
error "Bad rss-count".
2. The reserved folio (zero folio) is freed when folio->refcount is zero,
then free_pages_prepare->free_page_is_bad() report error
"Bad page state".
There is more, the following warning could also theoretically be triggered:
__replace_page()
-> ...
-> folio_remove_rmap_pte()
-> VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(is_zero_folio(folio), folio)
Considering that uprobe hit on the zero folio is a very rare case, just
reject zero old folio immediately after get_user_page_vma_remote().
[ mingo: Cleaned up the changelog ]
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nuprobes: Reject the shared zeropage in uprobe_write_opcode()\n\nWe triggered the following crash in syzkaller tests:\n\n BUG: Bad page state in process syz.7.38 pfn:1eff3\n page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1eff3\n flags: 0x3fffff00004004(referenced|reserved|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)\n raw: 003fffff00004004 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 0000000000000000\n raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe 0000000000000000\n page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50\n bad_page+0x69/0xf0\n free_unref_page_prepare+0x401/0x500\n free_unref_page+0x6d/0x1b0\n uprobe_write_opcode+0x460/0x8e0\n install_breakpoint.part.0+0x51/0x80\n register_for_each_vma+0x1d9/0x2b0\n __uprobe_register+0x245/0x300\n bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach+0x29b/0x4f0\n link_create+0x1e2/0x280\n __sys_bpf+0x75f/0xac0\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x30\n do_syscall_64+0x56/0x100\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2\n\n BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000452453e0 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-1\n\nThe following syzkaller test case can be used to reproduce:\n\n r2 = creat(\u0026(0x7f0000000000)=\u0027./file0\\x00\u0027, 0x8)\n write$nbd(r2, \u0026(0x7f0000000580)=ANY=[], 0x10)\n r4 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, \u0026(0x7f0000000040)=\u0027./file0\\x00\u0027, 0x42, 0x0)\n mmap$IORING_OFF_SQ_RING(\u0026(0x7f0000ffd000/0x3000)=nil, 0x3000, 0x0, 0x12, r4, 0x0)\n r5 = userfaultfd(0x80801)\n ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r5, 0xc018aa3f, \u0026(0x7f0000000040)={0xaa, 0x20})\n r6 = userfaultfd(0x80801)\n ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r6, 0xc018aa3f, \u0026(0x7f0000000140))\n ioctl$UFFDIO_REGISTER(r6, 0xc020aa00, \u0026(0x7f0000000100)={{\u0026(0x7f0000ffc000/0x4000)=nil, 0x4000}, 0x2})\n ioctl$UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE(r5, 0xc020aa04, \u0026(0x7f0000000000)={{\u0026(0x7f0000ffd000/0x1000)=nil, 0x1000}})\n r7 = bpf$PROG_LOAD(0x5, \u0026(0x7f0000000140)={0x2, 0x3, \u0026(0x7f0000000200)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB=\"1800000000120000000000000000000095\"], \u0026(0x7f0000000000)=\u0027GPL\\x00\u0027, 0x7, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, \u0027\\x00\u0027, 0x0, @fallback=0x30, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0, @void, @value}, 0x94)\n bpf$BPF_LINK_CREATE_XDP(0x1c, \u0026(0x7f0000000040)={r7, 0x0, 0x30, 0x1e, @val=@uprobe_multi={\u0026(0x7f0000000080)=\u0027./file0\\x00\u0027, \u0026(0x7f0000000100)=[0x2], 0x0, 0x0, 0x1}}, 0x40)\n\nThe cause is that zero pfn is set to the PTE without increasing the RSS\ncount in mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage() and the refcount of zero folio does\nnot increase accordingly. Then, the operation on the same pfn is performed\nin uprobe_write_opcode()-\u003e__replace_page() to unconditional decrease the\nRSS count and old_folio\u0027s refcount.\n\nTherefore, two bugs are introduced:\n\n 1. The RSS count is incorrect, when process exit, the check_mm() report\n error \"Bad rss-count\".\n\n 2. The reserved folio (zero folio) is freed when folio-\u003erefcount is zero,\n then free_pages_prepare-\u003efree_page_is_bad() report error\n \"Bad page state\".\n\nThere is more, the following warning could also theoretically be triggered:\n\n __replace_page()\n -\u003e ...\n -\u003e folio_remove_rmap_pte()\n -\u003e VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(is_zero_folio(folio), folio)\n\nConsidering that uprobe hit on the zero folio is a very rare case, just\nreject zero old folio immediately after get_user_page_vma_remote().\n\n[ mingo: Cleaned up the changelog ]" }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: uprobes: Rechazar la p\u00e1gina cero compartida en uprobe_write_opcode() Activamos el siguiente fallo en las pruebas de syzkaller: ERROR: Estado de p\u00e1gina incorrecto en el proceso syz.7.38 pfn:1eff3 page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1eff3 flags: 0x3fffff00004004(referenced|reserved|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) raw: 003fffff00004004 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 000000000000000 raw: 000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffffe 0000000000000000 p\u00e1gina volcada porque: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE indicador(es) establecido(s) Nombre del hardware: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 01/04/2014 Seguimiento de llamadas: dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50 bad_page+0x69/0xf0 free_unref_page_prepare+0x401/0x500 free_unref_page+0x6d/0x1b0 uprobe_write_opcode+0x460/0x8e0 install_breakpoint.part.0+0x51/0x80 register_for_each_vma+0x1d9/0x2b0 __uprobe_register+0x245/0x300 bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach+0x29b/0x4f0 link_create+0x1e2/0x280 __sys_bpf+0x75f/0xac0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x56/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2 BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000452453e0 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-1 The following syzkaller test case can be used to reproduce: r2 = creat(\u0026amp;(0x7f0000000000)=\u0027./file0\\x00\u0027, 0x8) write$nbd(r2, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000580)=ANY=[], 0x10) r4 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000040)=\u0027./file0\\x00\u0027, 0x42, 0x0) mmap$IORING_OFF_SQ_RING(\u0026amp;(0x7f0000ffd000/0x3000)=nil, 0x3000, 0x0, 0x12, r4, 0x0) r5 = userfaultfd(0x80801) ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r5, 0xc018aa3f, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000040)={0xaa, 0x20}) r6 = userfaultfd(0x80801) ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r6, 0xc018aa3f, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000140)) ioctl$UFFDIO_REGISTER(r6, 0xc020aa00, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000100)={{\u0026amp;(0x7f0000ffc000/0x4000)=nil, 0x4000}, 0x2}) ioctl$UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE(r5, 0xc020aa04, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000000)={{\u0026amp;(0x7f0000ffd000/0x1000)=nil, 0x1000}}) r7 = bpf$PROG_LOAD(0x5, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000140)={0x2, 0x3, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000200)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB=\"1800000000120000000000000000000095\"], \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000000)=\u0027GPL\\x00\u0027, 0x7, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, \u0027\\x00\u0027, 0x0, @fallback=0x30, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0, @void, @value}, 0x94) bpf$BPF_LINK_CREATE_XDP(0x1c, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000040)={r7, 0x0, 0x30, 0x1e, @val=@uprobe_multi={\u0026amp;(0x7f0000000080)=\u0027./file0\\x00\u0027, \u0026amp;(0x7f0000000100)=[0x2], 0x0, 0x0, 0x1}}, 0x40) La causa es que cero El pfn se establece en el PTE sin aumentar el recuento RSS en mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage() y el recuento de referencias del folio cero no aumenta en consecuencia. Luego, se realiza la misma operaci\u00f3n en el pfn en uprobe_write_opcode()-\u0026gt;__replace_page() para disminuir incondicionalmente el recuento RSS y el recuento de referencias de old_folio. Por lo tanto, se introducen dos errores: 1. El recuento RSS es incorrecto; al finalizar el proceso, check_mm() informa el error \"Bad RSS-count\" (recuento RSS incorrecto). 2. El folio reservado (folio cero) se libera cuando folio-\u0026gt;refcount es cero; entonces, free_pages_prepare-\u0026gt;free_page_is_bad() informa el error \"Bad page state\" (estado de p\u00e1gina incorrecto). Hay m\u00e1s, la siguiente advertencia tambi\u00e9n podr\u00eda activarse te\u00f3ricamente: __replace_page() -\u0026gt; ... -\u0026gt; folio_remove_rmap_pte() -\u0026gt; VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(is_zero_folio(folio), folio) Teniendo en cuenta que el impacto de uprobe en el folio cero es un caso muy raro, simplemente rechace el folio antiguo cero inmediatamente despu\u00e9s de get_user_page_vma_remote(). [ mingo: Se limpi\u00f3 el registro de cambios ]" } ], "id": "CVE-2025-21881", "lastModified": "2025-03-27T16:45:12.210", "metrics": {}, "published": "2025-03-27T15:15:56.000", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b6f19714588cf2366b0364234f97ba963688f63" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13cca2b73e2b0ec3ea6d6615d615395621d22752" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/54011fc94422f094eaf47555284de70a4bc32bb9" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bddf10d26e6e5114e7415a0e442ec6f51a559468" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c4cb2bfa99513311886c1eb5c1c2ac26f3338a6e" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…