fkie_cve-2025-21657
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-21 13:15
Modified
2025-10-15 13:48
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched_ext: Replace rq_lock() to raw_spin_rq_lock() in scx_ops_bypass()
scx_ops_bypass() iterates all CPUs to re-enqueue all the scx tasks.
For each CPU, it acquires a lock using rq_lock() regardless of whether
a CPU is offline or the CPU is currently running a task in a higher
scheduler class (e.g., deadline). The rq_lock() is supposed to be used
for online CPUs, and the use of rq_lock() may trigger an unnecessary
warning in rq_pin_lock(). Therefore, replace rq_lock() to
raw_spin_rq_lock() in scx_ops_bypass().
Without this change, we observe the following warning:
===== START =====
[ 6.615205] rq->balance_callback && rq->balance_callback != &balance_push_callback
[ 6.615208] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1730 __schedule+0x1130/0x1c90
===== END =====
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "2812EE25-BBB7-4C1D-8B29-4EBB100EB7AE",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.12.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0E698080-7669-4132-8817-4C674EEBCE54",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1EF8CD82-1EAE-4254-9545-F85AB94CF90F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "62567B3C-6CEE-46D0-BC2E-B3717FBF7D13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5A073481-106D-4B15-B4C7-FB0213B8E1D4",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "DE491969-75AE-4A6B-9A58-8FC5AF98798F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "93C0660D-7FB8-4FBA-892A-B064BA71E49E",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "034C36A6-C481-41F3-AE9A-D116E5BE6895",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "8AF9DC49-2085-4FFB-A7E3-73DFAFECC7F2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched_ext: Replace rq_lock() to raw_spin_rq_lock() in scx_ops_bypass()\n\nscx_ops_bypass() iterates all CPUs to re-enqueue all the scx tasks.\nFor each CPU, it acquires a lock using rq_lock() regardless of whether\na CPU is offline or the CPU is currently running a task in a higher\nscheduler class (e.g., deadline). The rq_lock() is supposed to be used\nfor online CPUs, and the use of rq_lock() may trigger an unnecessary\nwarning in rq_pin_lock(). Therefore, replace rq_lock() to\nraw_spin_rq_lock() in scx_ops_bypass().\n\nWithout this change, we observe the following warning:\n\n===== START =====\n[ 6.615205] rq-\u003ebalance_callback \u0026\u0026 rq-\u003ebalance_callback != \u0026balance_push_callback\n[ 6.615208] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1730 __schedule+0x1130/0x1c90\n===== END ====="
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: sched_ext: Reemplace rq_lock() por raw_spin_rq_lock() en scx_ops_bypass() scx_ops_bypass() itera todas las CPU para volver a poner en cola todas las tareas de scx. Para cada CPU, adquiere un bloqueo mediante rq_lock() independientemente de si una CPU est\u00e1 fuera de l\u00ednea o si la CPU est\u00e1 ejecutando actualmente una tarea en una clase de programador superior (por ejemplo, fecha l\u00edmite). Se supone que rq_lock() se debe utilizar para CPU en l\u00ednea, y el uso de rq_lock() puede activar una advertencia innecesaria en rq_pin_lock(). Por lo tanto, reemplace rq_lock() por raw_spin_rq_lock() en scx_ops_bypass(). Sin este cambio, observamos la siguiente advertencia: ===== START ===== [ 6.615205] rq-\u0026gt;balance_callback \u0026amp;\u0026amp; rq-\u0026gt;balance_callback != \u0026amp;balance_push_callback [ 6.615208] ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 2 PID: 0 en kernel/sched/sched.h:1730 __schedule+0x1130/0x1c90 ===== END ========== "
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-21657",
"lastModified": "2025-10-15T13:48:46.157",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-01-21T13:15:09.340",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6268d5bc10354fc2ab8d44a0cd3b042d49a0417e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9e446dd63cee7161717a6a8414ba9c6435af764"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…