fkie_cve-2024-53690
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-11 13:15
Modified
2025-10-15 20:47
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: prevent use of deleted inode
syzbot reported a WARNING in nilfs_rmdir. [1]
Because the inode bitmap is corrupted, an inode with an inode number that
should exist as a ".nilfs" file was reassigned by nilfs_mkdir for "file0",
causing an inode duplication during execution. And this causes an
underflow of i_nlink in rmdir operations.
The inode is used twice by the same task to unmount and remove directories
".nilfs" and "file0", it trigger warning in nilfs_rmdir.
Avoid to this issue, check i_nlink in nilfs_iget(), if it is 0, it means
that this inode has been deleted, and iput is executed to reclaim it.
[1]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5824 at fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0xc4/0x110 fs/inode.c:407
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
nilfs_rmdir+0x1b0/0x250 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:342
vfs_rmdir+0x3a3/0x510 fs/namei.c:4394
do_rmdir+0x3b5/0x580 fs/namei.c:4453
__do_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4472 [inline]
__se_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4470 [inline]
__x64_sys_rmdir+0x47/0x50 fs/namei.c:4470
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.13 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "805EFDC0-9644-4B98-86D5-A4A79E6A376A", "versionEndExcluding": "5.4.289", "versionStartIncluding": "2.6.30", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "44569A17-FE4C-4BE3-9C0C-74AC54C7B51B", "versionEndExcluding": "5.10.233", "versionStartIncluding": "5.5", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "DDBD8FC6-2357-4347-BFA1-B4A4A3039F35", "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.176", "versionStartIncluding": "5.11", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3B06AD1C-E7B3-4B24-A884-D3BE92CC042F", "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.122", "versionStartIncluding": "5.16", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "74BA9823-CCED-4B24-815D-B82543954BF8", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.68", "versionStartIncluding": "6.2", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "811AC89A-14AC-49FA-9B54-E99526F1CA47", "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.7", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "62567B3C-6CEE-46D0-BC2E-B3717FBF7D13", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "5A073481-106D-4B15-B4C7-FB0213B8E1D4", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "DE491969-75AE-4A6B-9A58-8FC5AF98798F", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnilfs2: prevent use of deleted inode\n\nsyzbot reported a WARNING in nilfs_rmdir. [1]\n\nBecause the inode bitmap is corrupted, an inode with an inode number that\nshould exist as a \".nilfs\" file was reassigned by nilfs_mkdir for \"file0\",\ncausing an inode duplication during execution. And this causes an\nunderflow of i_nlink in rmdir operations.\n\nThe inode is used twice by the same task to unmount and remove directories\n\".nilfs\" and \"file0\", it trigger warning in nilfs_rmdir.\n\nAvoid to this issue, check i_nlink in nilfs_iget(), if it is 0, it means\nthat this inode has been deleted, and iput is executed to reclaim it.\n\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5824 at fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0xc4/0x110 fs/inode.c:407\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n nilfs_rmdir+0x1b0/0x250 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:342\n vfs_rmdir+0x3a3/0x510 fs/namei.c:4394\n do_rmdir+0x3b5/0x580 fs/namei.c:4453\n __do_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4472 [inline]\n __se_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4470 [inline]\n __x64_sys_rmdir+0x47/0x50 fs/namei.c:4470\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f" }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: nilfs2: evitar el uso de inodo eliminado syzbot inform\u00f3 una ADVERTENCIA en nilfs_rmdir. [1] Debido a que el mapa de bits del inodo est\u00e1 da\u00f1ado, un inodo con un n\u00famero de inodo que deber\u00eda existir como un archivo \".nilfs\" fue reasignado por nilfs_mkdir para \"file0\", lo que provoc\u00f3 una duplicaci\u00f3n de inodo durante la ejecuci\u00f3n. Y esto causa un desbordamiento de i_nlink en operaciones rmdir. El inodo es utilizado dos veces por la misma tarea para desmontar y eliminar los directorios \".nilfs\" y \"file0\", lo que activa una advertencia en nilfs_rmdir. Evite este problema, verifique i_nlink en nilfs_iget(), si es 0, significa que este inodo ha sido eliminado y se ejecuta iput para recuperarlo. [1] ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 1 PID: 5824 en fs/inode.c:407 drop_nlink+0xc4/0x110 fs/inode.c:407 ... Seguimiento de llamadas: nilfs_rmdir+0x1b0/0x250 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:342 vfs_rmdir+0x3a3/0x510 fs/namei.c:4394 do_rmdir+0x3b5/0x580 fs/namei.c:4453 __do_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4472 [en l\u00ednea] __se_sys_rmdir fs/namei.c:4470 [en l\u00ednea] __x64_sys_rmdir+0x47/0x50 fs/namei.c:4470 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [en l\u00ednea] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f" } ], "id": "CVE-2024-53690", "lastModified": "2025-10-15T20:47:12.663", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2025-01-11T13:15:26.470", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/284760b320a0bac411b18108316939707dccb12b" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55e4baa0d32f0530ddc64c26620e1f2f8fa2724c" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d4ed71327b0b5f3b179a19dc3c06be9509ab3db" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/901ce9705fbb9f330ff1f19600e5daf9770b0175" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/912188316a8c9e41b8c1603c2276a05043b14f96" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef942d233643777f7b2a5deef620e82942983143" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff561987ff12b6a3233431ff659b5d332e22f153" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…