fkie_cve-2024-53124
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-12-02 14:15
Modified
2025-02-02 11:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix data-races around sk->sk_forward_alloc
Syzkaller reported this warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #26
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0
Code: 24 12 4c 89 e2 5b 48 c7 c7 98 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 d1 18 17 ff 4c 89 e6 5b 48 c7 c7 d0 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 bf 18 17 ff 0f 0b eb 83 <0f> 0b eb 97 0f 0b eb 87 0f 0b e9 68 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000008bd90 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffff88810b172a90 RCX: 0000000000000007
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000300 RDI: ffff88810b172a00
RBP: ffff88810b172a00 R08: ffff888104273c00 R09: 0000000000100007
R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88810b172a00
R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888237c31f78
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007ffc63fecac8 CR3: 000000000342e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __warn+0x88/0x130
? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0
? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0
? handle_bug+0x53/0x90
? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0
__sk_destruct+0x2a/0x200
rcu_do_batch+0x1aa/0x530
? rcu_do_batch+0x13b/0x530
rcu_core+0x159/0x2f0
handle_softirqs+0xd3/0x2b0
? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
run_ksoftirqd+0x25/0x30
smpboot_thread_fn+0xdd/0x1d0
kthread+0xd3/0x100
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Its possible that two threads call tcp_v6_do_rcv()/sk_forward_alloc_add()
concurrently when sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN with sk->sk_lock unlocked,
which triggers a data-race around sk->sk_forward_alloc:
tcp_v6_rcv
tcp_v6_do_rcv
skb_clone_and_charge_r
sk_rmem_schedule
__sk_mem_schedule
sk_forward_alloc_add()
skb_set_owner_r
sk_mem_charge
sk_forward_alloc_add()
__kfree_skb
skb_release_all
skb_release_head_state
sock_rfree
sk_mem_uncharge
sk_forward_alloc_add()
sk_mem_reclaim
// set local var reclaimable
__sk_mem_reclaim
sk_forward_alloc_add()
In this syzkaller testcase, two threads call
tcp_v6_do_rcv() with skb->truesize=768, the sk_forward_alloc changes like
this:
(cpu 1) | (cpu 2) | sk_forward_alloc
... | ... | 0
__sk_mem_schedule() | | +4096 = 4096
| __sk_mem_schedule() | +4096 = 8192
sk_mem_charge() | | -768 = 7424
| sk_mem_charge() | -768 = 6656
... | ... |
sk_mem_uncharge() | | +768 = 7424
reclaimable=7424 | |
| sk_mem_uncharge() | +768 = 8192
| reclaimable=8192 |
__sk_mem_reclaim() | | -4096 = 4096
| __sk_mem_reclaim() | -8192 = -4096 != 0
The skb_clone_and_charge_r() should not be called in tcp_v6_do_rcv() when
sk->sk_state is TCP_LISTEN, it happens later in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock().
Fix the same issue in dccp_v6_do_rcv().
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | |
---|---|---|---|
linux | linux_kernel | * | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
{ "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "BAAC4539-72AA-4F8F-8CEB-AFAC1E1348A9", "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.10", "versionStartIncluding": "4.4", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "1EF8CD82-1EAE-4254-9545-F85AB94CF90F", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fix data-races around sk-\u003esk_forward_alloc\n\nSyzkaller reported this warning:\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #26\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n Code: 24 12 4c 89 e2 5b 48 c7 c7 98 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 d1 18 17 ff 4c 89 e6 5b 48 c7 c7 d0 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 bf 18 17 ff 0f 0b eb 83 \u003c0f\u003e 0b eb 97 0f 0b eb 87 0f 0b e9 68 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00\n RSP: 0018:ffffc9000008bd90 EFLAGS: 00010206\n RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffff88810b172a90 RCX: 0000000000000007\n RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000300 RDI: ffff88810b172a00\n RBP: ffff88810b172a00 R08: ffff888104273c00 R09: 0000000000100007\n R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88810b172a00\n R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888237c31f78\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007ffc63fecac8 CR3: 000000000342e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n Call Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __warn+0x88/0x130\n ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n ? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0\n ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0\n __sk_destruct+0x2a/0x200\n rcu_do_batch+0x1aa/0x530\n ? rcu_do_batch+0x13b/0x530\n rcu_core+0x159/0x2f0\n handle_softirqs+0xd3/0x2b0\n ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10\n run_ksoftirqd+0x25/0x30\n smpboot_thread_fn+0xdd/0x1d0\n kthread+0xd3/0x100\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n\nIts possible that two threads call tcp_v6_do_rcv()/sk_forward_alloc_add()\nconcurrently when sk-\u003esk_state == TCP_LISTEN with sk-\u003esk_lock unlocked,\nwhich triggers a data-race around sk-\u003esk_forward_alloc:\ntcp_v6_rcv\n tcp_v6_do_rcv\n skb_clone_and_charge_r\n sk_rmem_schedule\n __sk_mem_schedule\n sk_forward_alloc_add()\n skb_set_owner_r\n sk_mem_charge\n sk_forward_alloc_add()\n __kfree_skb\n skb_release_all\n skb_release_head_state\n sock_rfree\n sk_mem_uncharge\n sk_forward_alloc_add()\n sk_mem_reclaim\n // set local var reclaimable\n __sk_mem_reclaim\n sk_forward_alloc_add()\n\nIn this syzkaller testcase, two threads call\ntcp_v6_do_rcv() with skb-\u003etruesize=768, the sk_forward_alloc changes like\nthis:\n (cpu 1) | (cpu 2) | sk_forward_alloc\n ... | ... | 0\n __sk_mem_schedule() | | +4096 = 4096\n | __sk_mem_schedule() | +4096 = 8192\n sk_mem_charge() | | -768 = 7424\n | sk_mem_charge() | -768 = 6656\n ... | ... |\n sk_mem_uncharge() | | +768 = 7424\n reclaimable=7424 | |\n | sk_mem_uncharge() | +768 = 8192\n | reclaimable=8192 |\n __sk_mem_reclaim() | | -4096 = 4096\n | __sk_mem_reclaim() | -8192 = -4096 != 0\n\nThe skb_clone_and_charge_r() should not be called in tcp_v6_do_rcv() when\nsk-\u003esk_state is TCP_LISTEN, it happens later in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock().\nFix the same issue in dccp_v6_do_rcv()." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net: fix data-races around sk-\u0026gt;sk_forward_alloc Syzkaller inform\u00f3 esta advertencia: ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]------------ ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 0 PID: 16 en net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 M\u00f3dulos vinculados: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 No contaminado 6.12.0-rc5 #26 Nombre del hardware: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 C\u00f3digo: 24 12 4c 89 e2 5b 48 c7 c7 98 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 d1 18 17 ff 4c 89 e6 5b 48 c7 c7 d0 ec bb 82 41 5c e9 bf 18 17 ff 0f 0b eb 83 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b eb 97 0f 0b eb 87 0f 0b e9 68 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000008bd90 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000300 RBX: ffff88810b172a90 RCX: 000000000000007 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000300 RDI: ffff88810b172a00 RBP: ffff88810b172a00 R08: ffff888104273c00 R09: 0000000000100007 R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff88810b172a00 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888237c31f78 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffc63fecac8 CR3: 000000000342e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Seguimiento de llamadas: ? __warn+0x88/0x130 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 ? report_bug+0x18e/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0 __sk_destruct+0x2a/0x200 rcu_do_batch+0x1aa/0x530 ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 run_ksoftirqd+0x25/0x30 smpboot_thread_fn+0xdd/0x1d0 kthread+0xd3/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ---[ fin del seguimiento 000000000000000 ]--- Es posible que dos subprocesos llamen a tcp_v6_do_rcv()/sk_forward_alloc_add() simult\u00e1neamente cuando sk-\u0026gt;sk_state == TCP_LISTEN con sk-\u0026gt;sk_lock desbloqueado, lo que desencadena una ejecuci\u00f3n de datos alrededor de sk-\u0026gt;sk_forward_alloc: tcp_v6_rcv tcp_v6_do_rcv skb_clone_and_charge_r sk_rmem_schedule __sk_mem_schedule sk_forward_alloc_add() skb_set_owner_r sk_mem_charge sk_forward_alloc_add() __kfree_skb skb_release_all skb_release_head_state sock_rfree sk_mem_uncharge sk_forward_alloc_add() sk_mem_reclaim // establecer variable local recuperable __sk_mem_reclaim sk_forward_alloc_add() En este caso de prueba de syzkaller, dos subprocesos llaman a tcp_v6_do_rcv() con skb-\u0026gt;truesize=768, sk_forward_alloc cambia de esta manera: (cpu 1) | (cpu 2) | sk_forward_alloc ... | ... | 0 __sk_mem_schedule() | | +4096 = 4096 | __sk_mem_schedule() | +4096 = 8192 sk_mem_charge() | | -768 = 7424 | sk_mem_charge() | -768 = 6656 ... | ... | sk_mem_uncharge() | | +768 = 7424 recuperable=7424 | | | sk_mem_uncharge() | +768 = 8192 | recuperable=8192 | __sk_mem_reclaim() | | -4096 = 4096 | __sk_mem_reclaim() | -8192 = -4096 != 0 No se debe llamar a skb_clone_and_charge_r() en tcp_v6_do_rcv() cuando sk-\u0026gt;sk_state es TCP_LISTEN, esto sucede m\u00e1s adelante en tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock(). Corrija el mismo problema en dccp_v6_do_rcv()." } ], "id": "CVE-2024-53124", "lastModified": "2025-02-02T11:15:11.360", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 4.7, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.0, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2024-12-02T14:15:13.220", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/073d89808c065ac4c672c0a613a71b27a80691cb" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f51f8c9d28954cf380100883a02eed35a8277e9" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/695fb0b9aecfd5dd5b2946ba8897ac2c1eef654d" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be7c61ea5f816168c38955eb4e898adc8b4b32fd" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c3d052cae566ec2285f5999958a5deb415a0f59e" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "tags": [ "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d285eb9d0641c8344f2836081b4ccb7b3c5cc1b6" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe2c0bd6d1e29ccefdc978b9a290571c93c27473" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-362" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…