fkie_cve-2024-52296
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2024-11-12 16:15
Modified
2024-11-13 17:01
Severity ?
Summary
libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == '\0') as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "libosdp is an implementation of IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) and provides a C library with support for C++, Rust and Python3. At ospd_common.c, on the osdp_reply_name function, any reply id between REPLY_ACK and REPLY_XRD is valid, but names array do not declare all of the range. On a case of an undefined reply id within the range, name will be null (name = names[reply_id - REPLY_ACK];). Null name will casue a crash on next line: if (name[0] == \u0027\\0\u0027) as null[0] is invalid. As this logic is not limited to a secure connection, attacker may trigger this vulnerability without any prior knowledge. This issue is fixed in 2.4.0."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "libosdp es una implementaci\u00f3n de IEC 60839-11-5 OSDP (Open Supervised Device Protocol) y proporciona una librer\u00eda C con soporte para C++, Rust y Python3. En ospd_common.c, en la funci\u00f3n osdp_reply_name, cualquier id de respuesta entre REPLY_ACK y REPLY_XRD es v\u00e1lido, pero la matriz de nombres no declara todo el rango. En el caso de un id de respuesta indefinido dentro del rango, el nombre ser\u00e1 nulo (nombre = nombres[id_de_respuesta - REPLY_ACK];). Un nombre nulo provocar\u00e1 un bloqueo en la siguiente l\u00ednea: si (nombre[0] == \u0027\\0\u0027) ya que null[0] no es v\u00e1lido. Como esta l\u00f3gica no se limita a una conexi\u00f3n segura, el atacante puede activar esta vulnerabilidad sin ning\u00fan conocimiento previo. Este problema se solucion\u00f3 en 2.4.0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-52296",
"lastModified": "2024-11-13T17:01:58.603",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-11-12T16:15:26.030",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/commit/24409e98a260176765956ec766a04cb35984fab1"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/goToMain/libosdp/security/advisories/GHSA-7945-5mcv-f2pp"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…