fkie_cve-2024-11734
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-14 09:15
Modified
2025-01-14 09:15
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
A denial of service vulnerability was found in Keycloak that could allow an administrative user with the right to change realm settings to disrupt the service. This action is done by modifying any of the security headers and inserting newlines, which causes the Keycloak server to write to a request that has already been terminated, leading to the failure of said request.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0299
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0300
secalert@redhat.comhttps://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-11734
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2328846
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "A denial of service vulnerability was found in Keycloak that could allow an administrative user with the right to change realm settings to disrupt the service. This action is done by modifying any of the security headers and inserting newlines, which causes the Keycloak server to write to a request that has already been terminated, leading to the failure of said request.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Se encontró una vulnerabilidad de denegación de servicio en Keycloak que podría permitir que un usuario administrativo con derecho a cambiar la configuración del dominio interrumpa el servicio. Esta acción se realiza modificando cualquiera de los encabezados de seguridad e insertando nuevas líneas, lo que hace que el servidor de Keycloak escriba en una solicitud que ya se ha finalizado, lo que provoca el fracaso de dicha solicitud.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-11734",
   lastModified: "2025-01-14T09:15:19.443",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 6.5,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "NONE",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 2.8,
            impactScore: 3.6,
            source: "secalert@redhat.com",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-01-14T09:15:19.443",
   references: [
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0299",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:0300",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-11734",
      },
      {
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2328846",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "secalert@redhat.com",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-693",
            },
         ],
         source: "secalert@redhat.com",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.