fkie_cve-2023-53628
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-10-07 16:15
Modified
2025-10-29 11:15
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: drop gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs
The gfx.cp_ecc_error_irq is retired in gfx11. In gfx_v11_0_hw_fini still
use amdgpu_irq_put to disable this interrupt, which caused the call trace
in this function.
[ 102.873958] Call Trace:
[ 102.873959] <TASK>
[ 102.873961] gfx_v11_0_hw_fini+0x23/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[ 102.874019] gfx_v11_0_suspend+0xe/0x20 [amdgpu]
[ 102.874072] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x240/0x460 [amdgpu]
[ 102.874122] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x3d/0x80 [amdgpu]
[ 102.874172] amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset+0xd9/0x490 [amdgpu]
[ 102.874223] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x548/0xce6 [amdgpu]
[ 102.874321] amdgpu_debugfs_reset_work+0x4c/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 102.874375] process_one_work+0x21f/0x3f0
[ 102.874377] worker_thread+0x200/0x3e0
[ 102.874378] ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0
[ 102.874379] kthread+0xfd/0x130
[ 102.874380] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 102.874381] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
v2:
- Handle umc and gfx ras cases in separated patch
- Retired the gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs in gfx11
v3:
- Improve the subject and code comments
- Add judgment on gfx11 in the function of amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init
v4:
- Drop the define of CP_ME1_PIPE_INST_ADDR_INTERVAL and
SET_ECC_ME_PIPE_STATE which using in gfx_v11_0_set_cp_ecc_error_state
- Check cp_ecc_error_irq.funcs rather than ip version for a more
sustainable life
v5:
- Simplify judgment conditions
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: drop gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs\n\nThe gfx.cp_ecc_error_irq is retired in gfx11. In gfx_v11_0_hw_fini still\nuse amdgpu_irq_put to disable this interrupt, which caused the call trace\nin this function.\n\n[ 102.873958] Call Trace:\n[ 102.873959] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ 102.873961] gfx_v11_0_hw_fini+0x23/0x1e0 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874019] gfx_v11_0_suspend+0xe/0x20 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874072] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x240/0x460 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874122] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x3d/0x80 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874172] amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset+0xd9/0x490 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874223] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x548/0xce6 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874321] amdgpu_debugfs_reset_work+0x4c/0x70 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874375] process_one_work+0x21f/0x3f0\n[ 102.874377] worker_thread+0x200/0x3e0\n[ 102.874378] ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0\n[ 102.874379] kthread+0xfd/0x130\n[ 102.874380] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20\n[ 102.874381] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n\nv2:\n- Handle umc and gfx ras cases in separated patch\n- Retired the gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs in gfx11\n\nv3:\n- Improve the subject and code comments\n- Add judgment on gfx11 in the function of amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init\n\nv4:\n- Drop the define of CP_ME1_PIPE_INST_ADDR_INTERVAL and\nSET_ECC_ME_PIPE_STATE which using in gfx_v11_0_set_cp_ecc_error_state\n- Check cp_ecc_error_irq.funcs rather than ip version for a more\nsustainable life\n\nv5:\n- Simplify judgment conditions"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-53628",
"lastModified": "2025-10-29T11:15:43.547",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2025-10-07T16:15:45.810",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31b07aec4a2bdcab00770ea3a18efe49734ce153"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/720b47229a5b24061d1c2e29ddb6043a59178d79"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…